Silica – a nanomaterial?
Notification of a cosmetic product containing nano-form ingredients can be complex and involves more costs for the company (cosmetic product owner). The best way to simplify the notification process is to make sure that the Silica and related ingredients used do not fall to the nanomaterial category.

Silica, also known as silicone dioxide, is a mineral composed of silicon and oxygen and is used in cosmetics and personal care products, especially in make-up products. The type of Silica used in these products is the amorphous silica, which means it does not have a specific arrangement of the atoms and consequently it does not have a definite form. Silica (amorphous form) is also used as a food additive in the European Union (EU) and United States (U.S. approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)). Silica related products, such as hydrated silica, alumina magnesium metasilicate, aluminium calcium sodium silicate, aluminium iron silicates and sodium potassium aluminium silicate, are also used as cosmetic ingredients in the EU.

According to the European Cosmetic Regulation No. 1223/2009, a ‘nanomaterial’ is described as “an insoluble or biopersistant and intentionally manufactured material with one or more external dimensions, or an internal structure, on the scale from 1 to 100 nm”. Cosmetic products containing ‘nanomaterials’ are subject to a specific notification to the European Commission and the Responsible Person must notify “it by electronic means six months prior to being placed on the market”.

The European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) has issued an opinion regarding Silica (Synthetic Amorphous Silica – SAS) and its solubility and consequent classification as a nanomaterial. The SCCS stated that “In regard to the nanomaterial definition in the Cosmetic Regulation, none of the SAS materials (hydrophilic or hydrophobic) included in the dossier can be regarded as soluble”. It means that the SCCS considered that Silica is insoluble and, if more than 50% of its particles has a size below 100 nanometers, it may classify as a nanomaterial. This opinion applies to Silica and related materials (Hydrated Silica, Silica Dimethyl Silylate, Silica Silylate, Silica Dimethicone Silylate, Silica Caprylyl Silylate and, Silica Cetyl Silylate).

The Association of Synthetic Amorphous Silica Producers (ASASP) is composed by 9 members that represent the majority of synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) producers in Europe and considers that SAS is soluble and should not be regarded as a nanomaterial.

Nevertheless, the suppliers of raw materials containing Silica must provide documentation regarding the particle size distribution in the ingredient to confirm if the particle size is below the cut-off limit and if it consequently needs to be regarded as the nano-form (according to SCCS opinion).

If a cosmetic product contains Silica in the nano-form (or other ingredient in this form), it must be clearly indicated in the list of ingredients in the product label. The name of the ingredient shall be followed by the word ‘nano’ in brackets (e.g. Silica [NANO]).

The SCCS has published a scientific advice on the safety of nanomaterials in cosmetics. The Committee has identified some aspects of nanomaterials that constitute a basis for concern over safety to consumers’ health when used in cosmetics, including physicochemical aspects (e.g. very small dimensions of particles), exposure aspects (e.g. frequency and amounts applied, potential for systemic exposure and accumulation in the body) and other aspects (like novel properties). These concerns where detailed in the document in three separate annexes.

With the development of scientific knowledge and continuous investigation, nanomaterials are being used in cosmetics more and more. Nevertheless, caution must be taken since there are certain aspects of these ingredients that are not yet fully known and may represent a safety concern.

References:

  1. European Food Safety Authority – Re-evaluation of Silicon Dioxide (E 551) as a food additive. Available at: https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5088
  2. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/endocrine_disruptors/docs/cosmetic_1223_2009_regulation_en.pdf
  3. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Opinion on solubility of Synthetic Amorphous Silica (SAS). SCCS/1606/19. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_228.pdf
  4. Synthetic Amorphous Silica (SAS) industry response to the opinion of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) on silica in cosmetics with regard to solubility. Available at: https://www.asasp.eu/images/Publications/ASASP1101b_-_ASASP_response_to_solubility_SCCS_Opinion_Dec_2019_final.pdf
  5. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Scientific Advice on the safety of nanomaterials in cosmetics (SCCS/1618/20). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_239.pdf

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »