Cosmetic Product Labelling in the European Union
The Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 lays down the mandatory information that needs to be included in the packaging and container of a cosmetic products. In addition to this information, most cosmetic products include certain claims, which must be supported and properly substantiated.

EUROPEAN UNION LEGAL FRAMEWORK

A cosmetic product made available on the market shall be safe for human health when used under normal or reasonably foreseeable conditions of use.

According to the European Regulation on Cosmetic Products (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009), before making available a cosmetic product on the market the Responsible Person (RP) shall notify the product in the Cosmetic Products Notification Portal (CPNP). (see previous posts on CPNP and RP)

The original labelling, and, where reasonably legible, a photograph of the corresponding packaging are two of the mandatory information that need to be notified by the RP.

Cosmetic products introduced in the EU market must indicate in their container and packaging (in indelible, easily legible and visible lettering) the following information:

  • Name and address of the RP
    • If several addresses are indicated, the one where the RP makes readily available the PIF shall be highlighted (see previous post)
  • Nominal content at the time packaging (weight or volume)
  • Date until which the cosmetic products, stored under appropriate conditions, will continue to fulfil its initial function and will remain safe for human health
    • ‘Date of minimum durability’ or ‘Period After Opening’ (PAO)
  • Particular precautions to be observed in use and any special precautionary information on cosmetic products for professional use
  • Batch number of manufacture or the reference for identifying the cosmetic product
  • Function of the cosmetic product (unless it is clear from its presentation)
  • List of ingredients in descending order of concentration, preceded by the term ‘ingredients

For imported cosmetic products, the country of origin also needs to be indicated in the label.

COSMETIC PRODUCT CLAIMS

The majority of cosmetic products available on the market include claims on their label.

Claims can be in the form of texts, names, trademarks, pictures and figurative or other signs that convey explicitly or implicitly product characteristic or functions in the labelling, marketing and advertising of cosmetic products.

A cosmetic product cannot contain or imply false or irrelevant information and its claims should be supported by adequate and verifiable evidence (i.e., nothing should be claimed that cannot be supported). Overall, cosmetic products claims must be clear, true, objective, understandable and give enough information to allow consumers to make informed decisions. (see previous post)

Claims must be supported and properly substantiated, which means that the information provided must be proven. This proof may be obtained by researching the available literature, by experimental studies, by performing consumer perception tests or using all of the above. The decision on how to do it should be made in accordance with the nature of the product and type of claim.

SPECIFIC CLAIMS AND SUBSTANTIATION

Consumer demands are shaping the cosmetics industry and making it more sustainable and ‘eco-friendly’. Cosmetic companies are trying to adapt and we can see an increasing number of cosmetic products claiming to be ‘natural’, ‘environmental friendly’ and similar. But how can such claims be supported and properly substantiated?

For example, ISO 16128 provides guidelines on definitions and criteria for natural and organic cosmetic ingredients and products, specific to the cosmetics sector. Besides ISO 16128, the COSMOS and Natrue certifications have been used for cosmetic products and raw materials, and products compliant with these two are clearly labelled as such. The ISO standard may be used simultaneously with the other certifications and provides a worldwide unified criteria, but it does not work as a marketing claim (or label). (see previous post)

Nevertheless, more guidelines are needed when talking about clean, eco-friendly and sustainable products. These should cover responsible sourcing and stablish standards for higher degrees of transparency.

‘Free from’ claims are also a market trend and very much appreciated by consumers. Annex III of the Technical document on cosmetic claims (prepared by the Sub-Working Group on Claims) provides guidance for the application of the common criteria established by the Commission Regulation (EU) No 655/2013 to ‘free from’ claims. It includes illustrative and non-exhaustive examples of this type of claims, with the aim of helping the industry to correctly use them. (see previous post)

One example is the ‘free from parabens‘ claims, which should not be used. Certain parabens are safe when used according to the European Cosmetics Regulation, and the use of these type of claims is denigrating the entire group of parabens (authorized substances).

Not sure if your cosmetic product labelling is compliant with regulation? Need help on claims substantiation? Critical Catalyst can help! Feel free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

References:

  1. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products.
  2. Commission Regulation (EU) No 655/2013 of 10 July 22013 laying down common criteria for the justification of claims used in relation to cosmetic products.
  3. ISO 16128-1:2016. Cosmetics — Guidelines on technical definitions and criteria for natural and organic cosmetic ingredients – Part 1: Definitions for ingredients.

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »