Environmental Claims in the UK
Green claims are a trend among consumer goods and services. We often see claims like 'clean beauty', 'environmental friendly' and so many others. But how can companies ensure that these claims are not misleading? The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published its Green Claims Code, in order to help companies comply with legal obligations when making environmental claims.

CMA’S GREEN CLAIMS CODE

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is the United Kingdom’s primary competition and consumer authority.

In September 2021, CMA published its Green Claims Code, a Guidance on environmental claims on goods and services. The purpose is to help businesses understand and comply with their existing obligations under consumer protection law when making environmental claims. The published Guidance is based on consumer protection rules under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008.

Claims can be in the form of texts, names, trademarks, pictures and figurative or other signs that convey explicitly or implicitly product characteristic or functions in the labelling, marketing and advertising of cosmetic products. (see previous post)

CMA defines environmental claims as “claims which suggest that a product, service, process, brand or business is better for the environment“. Claims indicating or implying to have a positive environmental impact or no impact on the environmental are an example of this type of claims.

The CMA’s Guidance sets out 6 principles:

  • claims must be truthful and accurate;
  • claims must be clear and unambiguous;
  • claims must not omit or hide important relevant information;
  • comparisons must be fair and meaningful;
  • claims must consider the full life cycle of the product or service;
  • claims must be substantiated.

These principles are explained in the published guidance, giving examples of how each of them applies and more detailed case studies where multiple principles apply.

The CMA’s Guidance is applicable to companies operating across UK and also to foreign companies (bases outside UK) selling to UK consumers.

CTPA’S ENVIRONMENTAL AND GREEN CLAIMS GUIDANCE

The Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association (CTPA), the trade association for the UK cosmetic and personal care industry, published the Environmental and Green Claims Guidance. Besides summarizing claims legal framework, the EU approach and the UK approach, CTPA gives advice on how to approach specific claims, like ‘ocean friendly’, ‘environmentally friendly’, claims referring to packaging recycling/biodegradability, among others.

For example, when it comes to recyclability, if a claim refers to the whole packaging (which includes different components and materials), the recyclability of each component needs to be taken into account and claim substantiation needs to demonstrate that all of these components are recyclable.

Moreover, CTPA considers that claims like ‘ocean friendly’ and ‘environmentally friendly’ are very broad and ambiguous, being difficult to substantiate and also difficult for consumers to understand.

It is crucial to point out that cosmetic businesses placing products in the UK market must comply with legal requirements set out on general laws (that apply to all businesses) and with Schedule 34 of the Product Safety and Metrology Statutory Instrument (UK Cosmetics Regulation). (see previous post) This means that all claims made for cosmetic products, including environmental claims, must comply with both specific and horizontal legal requirements.

If you need further information or advice on which claims can be made for your cosmetic products and their proper substantiation, feel free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

References:

  1. Competition and Markets Authority. CMA guidance on environmental claims on goods and services. 20 September 2021. CMA146.
  2. Cosmetic Toiletry and Perfumery Association (CTPA). Environmental and Green Claims Guidance. October 2021.

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »