SCCS Preliminary Opinion on Sodium Bromothymol Blue (C186) as hair dyeing
Ingredients: SODIUM BROMOTHYMOL BLUE (C186)

Date of publication: 28/10/2022

Following the request from the EU Commission for a scientific opinion on the hair dye Sodium Bromothymol Blue (C186), on October 2022 the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) issued a preliminary opinion. In light of the data provided, when used in non-oxidative hair colouring products up to a maximum on-head concentration of 0.5%, the SCCS is of the opinion that the complete safety of Sodium Bromothymol Blue could not be assessed.

BACKGROUND

Sodium Bromothymol Blue (C186) (C27H27Br2NaO5S, CAS number: 34722-90-2) is a weak acid. The degree of ionisation depends on the pKa and the pH of the solution resulting in two possible forms and different colours. The cyclic nonionised form is mostly present at pH < pKa (7.1). At pH 7.1, 50% of each form is present in solution. As the pH increases, the open ionised form is mostly present, at pH > pKa. Sodium Bromothymol Blue is used as cosmetic ingredient in hair dyeing, non-oxidative hair colouring products with a final on-head concentration of up to 0.5%.

Following the request from the EU Commission for a scientific opinion on the hair dye Sodium Bromothymol Blue (C186), on October 2022 the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) issued a preliminary opinion which public consultation period ends on 23rd December 2022.

WHAT’S NEW?

In light of the data provided, when used in non-oxidative hair colouring products up to a maximum on-head concentration of 0.5%, the SCCS is of the opinion that the complete safety of Sodium Bromothymol Blue could not be assessed because: 

  • A Toxicological Threshold of Concern (TTC) approach was used to assess the safety of three impurities present in Sodium Bromothymol Blue. However, the SCCS estimated the Systemic Exposure Dose (SED) to exceed the TTC threshold for Cramer class III for non-genotoxic substances. At the same time, the use of TTC on its own to justify the safety of substances that are regulated under the EU Cosmetic Regulation is not sufficient to waive the information requirements on essential toxicological endpoints. 

Regarding the scientific concerns of the use of Sodium Bromothymol Blue in cosmetic products, the SCCS concluded that: 

  • While the use of TTC is acceptable to justify the safety of impurities and cosmetic ingredients that are added to a final product at low concentrations, it is not acceptable for the substances that are regulated under the EU Cosmetic Regulation. For this, data from New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) that are scientifically-accepted for the purpose, and/or other acceptable in vivo data on systemic toxicity, are required in an overall weight of evidence for safety. 

Even though the Applicant has provided data on two batches of Sodium Bromothymol Blue, the SCCS has concerns about the impurities identified in one of the batches (Guanghua batch), as the levels of these impurities exceed the TTC threshold both individually and collectively. Therefore, the SCCS considers that the presence of these impurities is not safe, and a batch of Sodium Bromothymol Blue matching the impurity profile of Guanghua batch cannot be recommended for use in marketed products.

References: 

1. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) – Opinion on Sodium Bromothymol Blue (C186) (CAS No. 34722-90-2), preliminary version of 24-25 October 2022, SCCS/1645/22 

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »