Amendments to the Transitional Provisions of the European Union MDR and IVDR
The proposed amendments aim to maintain patients’ access to a wide range of medical devices while ensuring the transition to the new framework. The ammendments proposal aims to extend the current transition period (Article 120 of the MDR), and it also deletes the ‘sell-off’ deadlines of both MDR and IVDR. The extension is staggered depending on the risk class of the device - until December 2027 for high-risk devices and December 2028 for medium and lower-risk devices.

The Proposal Amendments

The proposal has 3 articles:

  • Article 1 – Amendments to Article 120(2), (3) and (4) and to Articles 122 and 123 of the MDR.
  • Article 2 – Amendments to Article 110(4) and to Article 112 of the IVDR.
  • Article 3 – Entry into force and application

Amendments to MDR

Transition period extension

The validity of the certificates issued under the Directives that were valid on 26 May 2021 was extended. If the certificates have already expired when the proposed amendment enters into force, the extension is only applicable if the manufacturer has a signed contract with a notified body for the conformity assessment at time of the expiry.

The transition period is extended until 31 December 2027 for higher risk devices (class III and class IIb implantable devices) and until 31 December 2028 for medium and lower risk devices (other class IIb devices and class IIa, class Im, Is and Ir devices).

The amendment also introduces a transition period until 26 May 2026 for class III custom-made implantable devices.

Conditions for the transition period

The extended transition period applies only to ‘legacy devices’.

Moreover, the application of the extended transition period is subject to the following cumulative conditions:

  • The devices must continue to comply with the Directives
  • The devices do not significantly change their design and intended purpose
  • The devices do not present an unacceptable risk to the health or safety of patients, users, other persons, or public health
  • No later than 26 May 2024, the manufacturer has put in place a quality management system (QMS) according to the MDR.
  • No later than 26 May 2024, the manufacturer has lodged a formal application for conformity assessment according to MDR, and no later than 26 September 2024 the notified body and the manufacturer have signed a written agreement

The devices covered by a certificate issued according to the Directives remain subject to appropriate surveillance by the notified body that issued the certificate. However, the manufacturer can agree that this becomes responsibility of the notified body designated under the MDR.

Deletion of the sell-off provision

Devices placed on the market before the end of the transition period can be made further available on the market without a legal time restriction.

Amendments to IVDR

Devices placed on the market before the end of the transition period (May 26 2027 for class A sterile and B, May 26 2026 for class C and May 26 2025 for class D) can be made further available on the market without a legal time restriction.

If you wish to get more information about the provisions of the EU-MDR and the EU-IVDR, feel free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

European Commission Full Proposal

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »