SCCS Preliminary Opinion on Prostaglandins and Prostaglandin-analogues
Following the mandate from the European Commission, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) has published a preliminary opinion on Prostaglandins and Prostaglandin-analogues used in cosmetic products. This preliminary opinion is open for comments and the deadline was set for 23 november 2021.

PROSTAGLANDINS AND PROSTAGLANDIN-ANALOGUES

In 2018, a health assessment of eyelash growth treatments conducted by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) alerted the European Commission to the fact that the use of prostaglandins and their analogues as components of cosmetic products may include health risk for consumers.

Prostaglandins and their analogues are used in drugs to reduce ocular hypertension (glaucoma) and increased eyelash growth has been observed as a side effect. However, several cases of serious undesirable health effects were recorded in many European Union (EU) countries due to the use of cosmetic products containing prostaglandins or their analogues.

Due to the raised concerns, the Commission requested the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety to carry out a safety assessment on Prostaglandins or their analogues.

According to CosIng, the Commission database for information on cosmetic substances and ingredients, there are 14 cosmetic ingredients described as ‘a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin’, but other ingredients relevant to this chemical family can be found by using the keyword ‘prost’. Prostaglandins and their analogues are currently not restricted in cosmetic products, as they are not listed in the Annex of the EU Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products.

These ingredients are used in cosmetic and personal care products as eyelash and/or eyebrow conditioners. For example, isopropyl cloprostenate and ethyl tafluprostamide are designed to enhance the appearance of natural eyelashes and eyebrows by nourishing, moisturizing and protecting eyelashes and eyebrows from breakage. Since there were very limited data available on other prostaglandin analogues, the SCCS opinion was bases on these two ingredients (isopropyl cloprostenate and ethyl tafluprostamide).

In its preliminary opinion, the SCCS was not able to conclude on the safety of isopropyl cloprostenate and ethyl tafluprostamide, when used up to the intended use concentrations indicated in the respective dossiers (0.006% and 0.007% for isopropyl cloprostenate and 0.018% for ethyl tafluprostamide). The SCCS has noted serious concerns about the safety of these two ingredients when used in cosmetic products, in particular those that are intended for use in the proximity of the eye. The overall conclusion of the SCCS was that the use of prostaglandin analogues in cosmetic products constitutes a serious concern for consumer safety, on the basis of physicochemical aspects (very limited and insufficient data), toxicological aspects (in silico, in vitro, genotoxicity, human data), exposure aspects and other aspects (strong physiological effects).

With a collective consideration of the physicochemical, toxicological and exposure aspects noted above, the SCCS is of the view that there is a basis for serious concern that the use of the prostaglandin analogues, as notified through CPNP for use in cosmetic products, can pose a health risk to the consumer Considering the potent pharmacological activity and the scarcity/lack of safety data, the SCCS cannot advise on the concentrations of prostaglandin analogues that can be safely used in cosmetic products.

If you wish to get more information these ingredients and their use in cosmetic products, feel free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

References:

  1. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products.
  2. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Opinion on Prostaglandins and prostaglandin-analogues used in cosmetic products. (SCCS/1635/21). Preliminary version. 2021.

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »