EU MDR – Proposal for Extension of Transition Period
The transition to MDR has been slower than anticipated by the European Commission. Insufficient capacity of notified bodies and the low level of preparedness of manufacturers led to a proposal for extension of current MDR transition period with deadlines depending on the risk class of the devices.

The Covid-19 pandemic, the shortages of raw materials caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the low notified body capacity has put a strain on market readiness. It is expected the number of MDR certificates to be approximately 7,000 by May 2024, which is significatively lower than the 22,793 valid certificates issued under the Directives that will expire in that date.

Thus, at the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs (EPSCO) Council back on June 2022, some Health Ministers expressed their concerns that the implementation of the MDR could threaten the availability of certain medical devices and jeopardise the access of innovative technologies to the EU market. The Ministers called on the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) to propose solutions for the insufficient capacity of notified bodies and the low level of preparedness of manufacturers. The MDCG published the document MDCG 2022-14 on August 2022, laying out 19 actions to enhancing notified body capacity, access to notified bodies and manufacturers’ preparedness.

Despite their full support for the MDCG position paper 2022-14, several Member States, some Members of the European Parliament and stakeholders consider that those actions will not be sufficient and are calling for additional measures, namely an urgent, targeted legislative initiative to amend the MDR.

The European Commission has listened to the concerns and showed ready to act, presenting a proposal with solutions to the EPSCO Council on 9 December 2022.

The presented elements of a legislative proposal for an amendment of the MDR and IVDR include:

  • An extension of the transitional period [MDR Article 120(3)] with deadlines depending on the risk class of the device. Those deadlines could be 2027 for high-risk devices (class III and class IIb) and 2028 for low-risk devices (class IIa and class I);
  • The extension of the transitional period could be combined with an extension of the validity of certificates issued under the Directives;
  • Conditions to ensure that the extension applies only to devices that do not present unacceptable risks to health and safety, and that not undergone significant changes in design or intended purpose, and for which the manufacturers have already undertaken the necessary steps to launch the certification process under the MDR. These steps include an adaptation of their quality management system to the MDR and submission and/or acceptance of the manufacturer’s application for conformity assessment by a notified body before a certain deadline (e.g. 26 May 2024);
  • The removal of the ‘sell off’ provision [MDR Article 120(4) and IVDR Article 110(4)].

The specific legislative changes have not yet been announced. The extension of validity of certificates issued under the Directives, and if the proposed changes will affect in vitro diagnostic medical devices is still unclear.

The Commission will update the text and provide an MDCG position paper on the expiring of certificates. The legislative process to change the text is expected to begin in early 2023.

The topics for EPSCO Council on 9 December 2022 can be found here!

The recording of the meeting can be found here!

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »