UKCA Marking for Aerosol Products in the UK
UKCA marking will be mandatory for aerosol products placed in the UK, as the 'inverted epsilon symbol' will no longer be recognized. This applies to all kinds of aerosol products, including cosmetics. Companies will have until the end of the year to make their products compliant.
Picture of Marta Pinto

Marta Pinto

Regulatory Affairs Associate

EU AEROSOL DISPENSERS DIRECTIVE

Europe is considered a world leader in the sector of aerosol dispensers which concerns mainly consumer products (large volumes of products in various sectors: cosmetics, healthcare, food, etc.), but also a substantial number of products for professional use.

Besides the need to comply with the EU Cosmetics Regulation ((EC) No 1223/2009), cosmetic products packaged in aerosol dispensers need to comply with the additional requirements specified by the Council Directive 75/324/EEC (Aerosol Dispensers Directive, article 8) and its amendments and by Directive 2007/42/EC.

The Aerosol Dispensers Directive defines ‘aerosol dispenser’ as “any non-reusable container made of metal, glass or plastic and containing a gas compressed, liquefied or dissolved under pressure, with or without a liquid, paste or powder, and fitted with a release device allowing the contents to be ejected as solid or liquid particles in suspension in a gas, as a foam, paste or powder or in a liquid state“.

According to this Directive and its adaptations to technical progress (94/1/EC and 2008/47/EC), aerosols with a capacity of more than 50 ml must include the ‘inverted epsilon’ symbol (‘3’). This symbol certifies that the aerosol is in conformity with the Aerosols Dispenser Directive. Markings or inscriptions which might be confused with the ‘inverted epsilon’ symbol are prohibited.

Inverted Epsilon Symbol

UKCA MARKING FOR AEROSOL PRODUCTS

The UKCA (UK Conformity Assessed) marking came into effect last year for goods being placed on the market in Great Britain (GB – England, Wales and Scotland). The UKCA applies to most goods previously subject to the CE marking but also to aerosol products that previously required the ‘inverted epsilon’ symbol.

The Schedule 13 of the Product Safety and Metrology (UK Aerosols Regulation) initially stated that either the UKCA mark or the ‘reverted epsilon’ symbol could be affixed in the packaging. However, this will no longer apply and aerosols will need to bear the UKCA mark. Although it is not prohibited for aerosols to indicate the ‘inverted epsilon’ symbol, such mark will have no significance under the UK framework.

The UKCA marking must be clearly visible and legible. It must be placed on the product by the product’s manufacturer or authorized representative, which takes full responsibility for the product’s conformity with the requirements of the relevant legislation.

The UKCA marking was supposed to become compulsory at the beggining of this year. However, the Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) has give an extra year, and the UKCA marking will be mandatory from 1 January 2023. This means that aerosol products made available in GB can have either the UKCA or the ‘inverted epsilon’ symbol.

Until 31 December 2022, this mark may be affixed to a label (e.g., sticker) or a document accompanying the aerosol dispenser. From 1 January 2023, the UKCA marking needs to be placed directly on aerosol dispensers.

Aerosol dispensers marked with the UKCA marking will only be able to be placed on the GB market, as this marking is not recognized on the EU market.

UKCA Marking

Any doubts on how this can affect your cosmetic products? If you need any information regarding this or other subjects, fell free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

References:

  1. Council Directive of 20 May 1975 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to aerosol dispensers (75/324/EEC).
  2. Schedule 13: Aerosol Dispensers Regulations 2009.
  3. UK Product Safety and Metrology. What’s changed from 1 January 2021 in relation to Great Britain? Office for Product Safety & Standards. January 2021.

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »