SCCS Final Opinion on HAA299 (Nano)
HAA299 (non-nano) has been used in cosmetic products as a UV filter. In 2014, the SCCS considered that this ingredient in its non-nano form was safe for use as a UV-filter in cosmetics, at a maximum concentration of 10%. The SCCS released its final opinion regarding the use of HAA299 in its nano form.
Picture of Marta Pinto

Marta Pinto

Regulatory Affairs Associate

HAA299 AND ITS SAFETY

HAA299 (CAS number: 919803-06-8), also called Bis-(Diethylaminohydroxybenzoyl Benzoyl) Piperazine (INCI name) is an organic compound used as a UV-filter in cosmetics and personal care products. HAA299 (nano form and non-nano) is not currently included in the Annexes of the European Cosmetics Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009).

In 2014, the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) issued an opinion regarding the use of HAA299 as UV filter in sunscreen products. The SCCS concluded that the use of non-nano HAA299 (micronized or non-micronized, with median particle size distribution around 134 nm or larger) at a concentration up to 10% as an UV-filter in cosmetic products, does not pose a risk of systemic toxicity in humans. The SCCS safety evaluation does not apply to inhalation exposure and covered only the HAA299 in the non-nano form, not covering when this ingredient is composed of nano particles.

HAA299 has low oral bioavailability and scientific evidence shows an overall very low or lack of dermal absorption of HAA299 in human skin. Non-micronized HAA299 was not a dermal irritant when applied in rabbits but it caused slight irritation in the eyes of rabbits. No delayed contact hypersensitivity was observed in a murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA), but the sensitization potential of HAA299 could not be ruled out by the SCCS. Phototoxicity studies with HAA299 indicate that this ingredient has no phototoxic, photoallergic or photogenotoxic potential.

NEW SCCS OPINION ON HAA299 (NANO-FORM)

The SCCS released its new opinion regarding the safety of HAA299 in its nano-form (aqueous dispersion of nanoparticles formulation with excipients containing the HAA299 active UV filter ingredient that was micronized to nano size).

The available data indicated that HAA299 in the nano-form is a practically insoluble material, with very low dermal and oral absorption. Nano HAA299 did not show skin irritation potential or caused ocular corrosion or severe ocular irritation in in vitro tests. Skin sensitizing and phototoxic potential are considered unlikely.

The SCCS expressed concerns regarding the repeated use of products containing nano HAA299, due to the inflammatory effects on the lung after acute inhalation exposure. The Committee does not recommend the use of this ingredient in applications that could lead to exposure of the consumer’s lungs via inhalation.

Considering the currently available scientific evidence, which shows an overall very low or lack of dermal absorption of nano HAA299, the SCCS considers that “HAA299, either as non-nano or nano form, is safe when used as a UV-filter in dermally-applied cosmetic products up to a maximum concentration of 10%”. Moreover, the Committee indicated that the combined maximum concentration of the two forms (nano and non-nano) should not exceed 10% in cosmetic products.

The SCCS may consider the revision of its opinion if new evidence emerges in the future to show that nano HAA299 used as UV-filter in cosmetic products can penetrate human skin to reach viable cells in higher levels than demonstrated in the submission.

If you wish to get more information on the safety of cosmetic ingredients, feel free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

References:

  1. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products.
  2. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Opinion on HAA299 (nano). SCCS/1634/21. 2021
  3. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Opinion on 2-(4-(2-(4-Diethylamino-2-hydroxy-benzoyl)-benzoyl)- piperazine-1-carbonyl)-phenyl)- (4-diethylamino-2- hydroxyphenyl)-methanone (HAA299) as UV filter in sunscreen products. SCCS/1533/14. 2014

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »