New Amendments to the European Cosmetic Regulation
Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1099 of 5 July 2021 sets out that Deoxyarbutin should be prohibited in cosmetic products and that the use of Dihydroxyacetone should be restricted in non-oxidative hair dye products and in self-tanning products. This results in one new entry to Annex II and one new entry to Annex III of the European Cosmetic Regulation, respectively.

DEOXYARBUTIN AND DIHYDROXYACETONE

Deoxyarbutin (CAS No. 53936-56-4), chemically 4-[(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)oxy]phenol (INCI name: Tetrahydropyranyloxy Phenol) is a cosmetic ingredient used as a bleaching agent. It is a skin lightening agent synthesized through removal of hydroxyl groups from the glucose side-chain of ß-arbutin.

In 2008, on its opinion on ß-arbutin, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP) raised concerns with other substances resulting in the release and/or formation of hydroquinone. Hydroquinone is prohibited in cosmetics products, as it is listed in Annex II (entry 1339) of the European Cosmetic Regulation No 1223/2009. As an exception, Hydroquinone is only permitted for professional use in artificial nail systems in a concentration in the final product up to 0.02% (Annex III, entry 14).

The European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), concluded in 2015 that, due to safety concerns raised with regard to the life cycle of products containing that substance, the use of Deoxyarbutin up to 3% in face creams cannot be considered as safe.

Dihydroxyacetone (DHA, CAS No: 96-26-4) is an aliphatic ketone that is used as a hair dyeing, skin conditioning and tanning agent in cosmetics and personal care products. This ingredient is used in self-tanning cosmetic products in the EU market since the 1960’s.

In 2010, the SCCS published an opinion on the use of DHA on cosmetic products and concluded that the use of this substance as a self-tanning ingredient in cosmetic formulations up to 10% and in spray cabins up to 14% would not pose a risk to the health of the consumer. In another opinion, issued in 2020, the SCCS considered that DHA is safe when used as a hair coloring ingredient in leave-on applications (non-oxidative) up to a maximum concentration of 6.25%. Moreover, the SCCS also concluded that the use of Dihydroxyacetone as a hair coloring ingredient in leave-on applications (non-oxidative) up to a maximum concentration of 6.25 % together with the use of self-tanning lotion and face cream containing up to a maximum concentration of 10% Dihydroxyacetone is also considered safe.

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2021/1099

Until now, Deoxyarbutin and Dihydroxyacetone were not regulated in Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.

On July 5 2021 the Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1099, amending Annexes II and III of the European Cosmetic Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, entered into force.

Based on the SCCS opinions on both substances, the Commission considers that:

  • Deoxyarbutin should be prohibited for use in cosmetic products and added to the list of prohibited substances (Annex II) of the Cosmetics Regulation.
  • It is necessary to add a new entry in Annex III of the Cosmetics Regulation, restricting the use Dihydroxyacetone in non-oxidative hair dye products and in self-tanning products only, in a maximum concentration of up to 6.25% and 10% respectively.

Appropriate and reasonable periods of time should be granted to industry in order to adapt to the new requirements on the use of Dihydroxyacetone in cosmetic products and to phase out the placing and making available on the market of cosmetic products which do not comply with those requirements.

If you wish to know more information about these ingredients or amendments to the Eurpean Cosmetic Regulation, feel free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

References:

  1. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products.
  2. Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/1099 of 5 July 2021 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products.

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »