Ban of animal testing in Australia
Australia’s legislation regarding industrial chemicals has changed. Since July 1st 2020, animal testing information can no longer be used to prove safety of new cosmetic ingredients manufactured in or imported into Australia.

NEW AUSTRALIAN REGULATION AND PROHIBITION OF ANIMAL TESTING

In Australia, the National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS) has been replaced in the beginning of July, 2020 by a new scheme known as Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS), as established by the Industrial Chemicals Act 2019 (IC Act 2019). AICIS is now the entity responsible for regulating the manufacture and importation of industrial chemicals, and consequently regulating cosmetic products. Chemicals are regulated depending on their use and if it is not for a therapeutic, agricultural, veterinary or food use, it is considered an industrial chemical.

Under Australian law, ‘new animal test data’ is defined as “any data obtained from tests conducted on cephalopod or any live vertebrate animal (other than human being) on or after 1 July 2020”.

According to the IC Act 2019, safety of new cosmetic ingredients manufactured or imported into Australia cannot be demonstrated with animal testing information. This means that the current legislation bans the use of new animal test data to support the introduction into Australia of industrial chemicals used exclusively as cosmetic ingredients. There are also restrictions on using new animal test data for chemicals with multiple end uses (including in cosmetics). Cosmetics industry and the Department of Health are working together to develop a voluntary code of practice.

Ingredients and cosmetics that are already on the market will not be affected by this new legislation. For new cosmetic ingredients, instead of animal testing, legislation allows the use of alternative methods to support its introduction (and safety), like the ones validated by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) or computer-based modelling. Existing animal test data of a similar chemical can also be useful in the introduction of new chemicals and is overviewed in the legislation as an alternative also.  

Limited exception criteria, consistent with the European Union’s Regulation, have been set up regarding when new animal test data can be used for chemicals with an end use in cosmetics. The following exceptions apply where the new animal test data:

  • Shows that the chemical has a hazard characteristic and it conflicts with non-animal test data;
  • Is the only information that can demonstrate whether or not the chemical has a particular environment hazard characteristic;
  • Is from tests conducted on a different industrial chemical to the one that is being categorized or submitted an application for, and the company is not introducing that different chemical for an end use in cosmetics (read-across information from non-cosmetic chemicals);
  • The introduction has multiple end uses (including cosmetics), other exception criteria are not met and there is no alternative to animal test data.

All things considered, with the new Australian legislation, the ban of animal testing will cover most cosmetics introduced in Australia. Non-animal testing should be always considered first, and new animal test data should be faced as a last resort. Australian legislation allows for a range of alternative data sources to be provided instead of animal test data.

References:

  1. Australian Government, Department of Health – Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS) – website – https://www.industrialchemicals.gov.au/
  2. Australian Government – Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989 (ICNA Act)
  3. Australian Government – Industrial Chemicals Act 2019
  4. Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS) – Industrial Chemicals Categorisation Guidelines
  5. Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS) – Industrial Chemicals Categorisation Guidelines – Final Draft, 2019
  6. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products –

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »