Availability of Medical Devices in Europe After MDR Implementation – Findings From Medtech Europe Survey Report
Implementation of the MDR is a top priority for the medical devices industry, which has committed significant resources to comply with the new requirements. Despite its efforts, the sector remains seriously held back by the slow and piecemeal implementation of the new regulatory framework.

MedTech Survey Report

MedTech Europe published a Survey Report analysing the availability of Medical Devices in 2022 in connection to the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) implementation.

Methods

The survey was sent to all manufacturer members of MedTech Europe, and the answers were gathered between the 4th and 29th of April 2022. The survey included 30 questions divided in to two core sets. The first part was mainly aimed at assessing the capacity of Notified Bodies and the certification under the MDR while the second part included some additional questions. Only one submission per manufacturer was allowed.

Summary of results

  • The survey represents an estimated 60-70% market revenue coverage.
  • MDR certificates have not been issued yet for >85% of the >500 000 devices previously certified under the directives.
  • Larger companies are actively filing under MDR.
  • Review is still ongoing for 70% of submitted industry applications.
  • The time-to-certification with MDR-designated Notified Bodies is taking 13-18 months on average. This is double the time historically needed for certification under the Directives.
  • >50% of respondents plan portfolio reductions.
  • 33% of these companies’ medical devices are currently planned for discontinuation.
  • All product categories are impacted by potential device discontinuations.
  • At least 15 % and up to 30% of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) still have no access to an MDR-designated Notified Body.
  • ~50% of respondents are deprioritising the EU market (or will do so) as the geography of choice for first regulatory approval of their new devices.
  • >20% of respondents attribute delays in MDR certification to the publication of new or revised MDCG guidance.

Volume of devices certified under the MDR

The majority of the devices on the market is yet to transition to the MDR. Certificates have not been issued for approximately 85% of the more than 500 000 devices estimated to be covered by the Directive’s certificates. New devices and class III devices were more likely to lead to longer certification timescales.

This is possible due to delays of the time-to-certification by MDR-designated Notified Bodies (13-18 months on average, two times more than the time needed for certification under the Directives), which reflects in a slow progress to certification (only 14% of all certificates were issued so far). Additionally, it is important to note that 54,820 Class I devices will be up-classified under the MDR.

The challenges with Notified Bodies include: unpredictable certification time, lack of predictability, lack of responsiveness, non-harmonised interpretations of MDR requirements and non-harmonised interpretations of MDCG guidelines.

Changes in portfolio

83% of the portfolio of both large and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) who have legacy products, is composed of “legacy” devices.

However, over half of all survey respondents plan portfolio reductions, foreseeing to discontinue 33% of their devices. MDR implementation will affect transversely all categories of medical devices, which can have a prejudicial impact on healthcare systems. The categories of devices most likely to be impacted by portfolio reductions are orthopaedics, traumatology, rehabilitation and rheumatology; surgical instruments; medical software and devices for cardiology.

Impact on SMEs

The MDR have a more pronounced impact on SMEs than on larger companies with up to 30% of SMEs without a designated Notified Body capable of certification under the MDR. The progress to certification is also slower, with only 7% of MDR certificates issued for SMEs compared to 13% on average.

On the other hand, all current Notified Bodies used by the large company respondents are MDR-designated. The explanations for lower transition rate to MDR for SMEs include: costs of recertification, time, and resources for MDR becoming too high.

Innovation is leaving Europe

Approximately half of the respondents are deprioritising (or will do so) the EU market as choice for first regulatory approval of new devices, making evident that the MDR has not supported innovation in the EU.

Large companies are more likely to prioritise USA for new approvals while SMEs prioritised equally EU and USA. This means that approximately half of the EU based innovation will in fact benefit patients in the USA first, not in the EU.

MDCG guidance

Data suggests that MDCG guidance documents can slow down the certification process and lead to rework of the submitted applications.

More than 1 in 5 companies have reported a delay in certification due to a publication of new or revised MDCG guidance. Almost half of all delays led to some level of reworking, with larger companies to be more impacted.

The guidance documents associated with the delay were: MDCG 2021-24 Guidance on classification of medical devices; MDCG 2020-5 Clinical evaluation – Equivalence: A guide for manufacturers and notified bodies and MDCG 2020-6 Guidance on sufficient clinical evidence for legacy devices.

Conclusions

The implementation of the MDR in the EU is having a serious effect on the EU medical device market. This will be felt by EU patients and health systems.

The data also reveal that the MDR impacts differently larger versus smaller (SME) companies, showing clearly that SMEs are worse off.

Few devices have so far successfully transitioned to the MDR, and timescales for certification are now at an all-time high.

There is a urgent need for immediate action by decision-makers to help keep needed medical devices available in Europe.

Note: The survey performed by MedTech Europe represents an estimated 60-70 % of EU market revenue coverage, and with 475 respondents across large and SME companies there should be confidence in the conclusions drawn.

further
reading

news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »
news & updates

SCCS preliminary opinion on Citral sensitization endpoint

Ingredients: CITRAL

Date of publication: 27/03/2024

On March 27 2024, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on the safety of Citral in cosmetic products. The deadline for comments is set to June 2, 2024.

Read More »
cosmetic products

UK proposes ban of wet wipes containing plastic 

The UK has proposed, on April 24, 2024, a regulation titled The Environmental Protection (Wet Wipes Containing Plastic) (England) Regulations 2024, to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The regulation aims to eliminate the supply and sale of plastic-containing wet wipes, including cosmetic ones. The public can offer comments on the draft until June 23, 2024, with adoption expected in September of the same year.

Read More »
medical devices

Safety Reporting in Clinical Investigations: a Gap Analysis of Guidance Documents 

Safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices shall be performed in line with Article 80(2) of the EU MDR. On May 2020, it was published the MDCG 2020-10/1, outlining the procedures for safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices under the EU MDR. However, on October 2022 the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published an updated version of the MDCG 2020-10/1, the MDCG 2020-10/1 Rev 1. This article highlights the updates included in the new revision, analysing the gaps between both documents.

Read More »
medical devices

Roles and Responsibilities of an Authorised Representative under EU MDR and IVDR 

If a medical device manufacturer is not established in a Member State, the devices can only be placed on the Union market if the manufacturer designates an authorised representative. The authorised representative plays a pivotal role in ensuring the compliance of the devices with EU regulation, serving as point of contact. The obligations and responsibilities of authorised representative are outlined on Article 11 of both MDR and IVDR, but clarification of relevant requirements is described in MDCG 2022-16 of October 2022.

Read More »
medical devices

Understanding the ISO Standards Lifecycle

ISO Standards cover a huge range of activities, representing the distilled wisdom of people with expertise in their subject matter and providing the regulators with a sound basis to develop better legislation. ISO Standards are diverse, addressing from the shoe size we wear to the quality of air we breathe. The medical device sector is no exception. ISO has many International Standards and guidance documents aimed at helping the sector ensure safe and effective medical devices while meeting the multitude of national, regional and international regulatory requirements. But how exactly is a Standard developed, reviewed and withdraw?

Read More »
medical devices

Amendments to the Transitional Provisions of the European Union MDR and IVDR

The proposed amendments aim to maintain patients’ access to a wide range of medical devices while ensuring the transition to the new framework. The ammendments proposal aims to extend the current transition period (Article 120 of the MDR), and it also deletes the ‘sell-off’ deadlines of both MDR and IVDR. The extension is staggered depending on the risk class of the device – until December 2027 for high-risk devices and December 2028 for medium and lower-risk devices.

Read More »
medical devices

EU MDR – Proposal for Extension of Transition Period

The transition to MDR has been slower than anticipated by the European Commission. Insufficient capacity of notified bodies and the low level of preparedness of manufacturers led to a proposal for extension of current MDR transition period with deadlines depending on the risk class of the devices.

Read More »
medical devices

MDCG 2022-18 – EU MDR Article 97

EU MDR Article 97 may be a temporary solution to avoid disruption of supply of Medical Devices on the EU Market. The MDCG 2022-18 presents a uniform approach for application of MDR Article 97 on non-compliant legacy devices under the conditions set by the competent authorities, while limiting the impact on the supply of safe and effective devices.

Read More »