Amendment to the European Standard for Risk Management of Medical Devices
An European amendment to EN ISO 14971 - Medical devices - Application of risk management to medical devices, designated A11:2021, was published in December 2021, paving the way to the standard being listed in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) as providing a presumption of conformity with the relevant requirements of the European Medical Device and In Vitro Diagnostics Regulations.

The amendment replaces the European foreword and adds two new Annexes – ZA and ZB – stating the relationship between the clauses of the standard and the requirements of the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR (EU) 2017/745) and In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR (EU) 2017/746).

The MDR and IVDR present more detailed requirements for the risk management process compared with the previous Directives. On the whole, the harmonization of ISO 14971:2019 as EN ISO 14971:2019+Amd 11:2021 is great news for the Medical Device manufacturer as it shows a stronger relationship between the standard and the risk management process required in the Regulations.

There are no content deviations in the Z Annexes of EN ISO 14971:2019+A11:2021. The Z Annexes state that once the standard has been published in the OJEU, compliance with the standard will give a presumption of conformity with the relevant General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPRs) of the MDR and IVDR.

Tables in Annex ZA and ZB show the relationship between the GSPRs in Annex I of each regulation with the clauses of EN ISO 14971. In particular, the tables address:

– GSPR 3 regarding the manufacturer’s risk management system;

– GSPR 4 regarding risk control measures;

– GSPR 5 regarding elimination or reduction of risks;

– GSPR 8 regarding known and foreseeable risks, and undesirable side-effects; and,

– GSPR 9 of the MDR regarding devices without a medical purpose.

In applying the standard considering new Annex Zs , it is important to note that:

– The tables indicate that, in regard to some of the requirements of the regulations, the standard covers the process requirements but not the device-specific execution of the process;

– The scope of application is limited to medical devices, accessories for a medical device as defined in the regulations and to products regulated as devices under the regulations;

– Z Annexes contain a number of explanatory notes stating that the manufacturer must comply with certain requirements of the MDR and IVDR which override any content of the standard;

– Annex ZA states that usability-specific aspects of applicable GSPRs are not covered. IEC 62366 covers usability of Medical Devices and it is expected to be harmonised in due course;

– The risk management process must comply with the requirement in the regulations that risks have to be reduced as far as possible and the manufacturer’s policy for establishing criteria for risk acceptability has to comply with the GSPRs of the regulations.

References:

  1. EN ISO 14971:2019+A11:2021, on application of risk management to medical devices

further
reading

cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »
cosmetic products

UK proposes ban of wet wipes containing plastic 

The UK has proposed, on April 24, 2024, a regulation titled The Environmental Protection (Wet Wipes Containing Plastic) (England) Regulations 2024, to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The regulation aims to eliminate the supply and sale of plastic-containing wet wipes, including cosmetic ones. The public can offer comments on the draft until June 23, 2024, with adoption expected in September of the same year.

Read More »
news & updates

SCCS preliminary opinion on Citral sensitization endpoint

Ingredients: CITRAL

Date of publication: 27/03/2024

On March 27 2024, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on the safety of Citral in cosmetic products. The deadline for comments is set to June 2, 2024.

Read More »
medical devices

Safety Reporting in Clinical Investigations: a Gap Analysis of Guidance Documents 

Safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices shall be performed in line with Article 80(2) of the EU MDR. On May 2020, it was published the MDCG 2020-10/1, outlining the procedures for safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices under the EU MDR. However, on October 2022 the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published an updated version of the MDCG 2020-10/1, the MDCG 2020-10/1 Rev 1. This article highlights the updates included in the new revision, analysing the gaps between both documents.

Read More »
medical devices

Roles and Responsibilities of an Authorised Representative under EU MDR and IVDR 

If a medical device manufacturer is not established in a Member State, the devices can only be placed on the Union market if the manufacturer designates an authorised representative. The authorised representative plays a pivotal role in ensuring the compliance of the devices with EU regulation, serving as point of contact. The obligations and responsibilities of authorised representative are outlined on Article 11 of both MDR and IVDR, but clarification of relevant requirements is described in MDCG 2022-16 of October 2022.

Read More »
medical devices

Understanding the ISO Standards Lifecycle

ISO Standards cover a huge range of activities, representing the distilled wisdom of people with expertise in their subject matter and providing the regulators with a sound basis to develop better legislation. ISO Standards are diverse, addressing from the shoe size we wear to the quality of air we breathe. The medical device sector is no exception. ISO has many International Standards and guidance documents aimed at helping the sector ensure safe and effective medical devices while meeting the multitude of national, regional and international regulatory requirements. But how exactly is a Standard developed, reviewed and withdraw?

Read More »