Virginia – The Fourth State to Ban Animal Testing in the U.S.
In the United States (U.S.), Virginia is the fourth state to ban animal testing in cosmetic products. The Governor of this state (Ralph Northam) has signed this month (March 2021) a bill and the ban will start on January 1st, 2022. The sale of cosmetics tested on animals will also be prohibited from July 1st, 2022.

SENATE BILL NO. 1379 – ANIMAL TESTING BAN

According to the Senate Bill No. 1379, starting January 1st, 2022, it will no longer be permitted to perform tests of cosmetic products on animals. Moreover, beginning July 1st, 2022, the sale of cosmetics tested on animals will also be banned.

The Humane Cosmetics Act “prohibits a cosmetics manufacturer from:

  • (i) conducting or contracting for cosmetic animal testing that occurs in the Commonwealth on or after January 1, 2022
  • (ii) manufacturing or importing to profit into the Commonwealth any cosmetic or ingredient thereof, if the cosmetics manufacturer knew or reasonably should have known that the cosmetic or any component thereof was developed or manufactured using cosmetic animal testing that was conducted on or after January 1, 2022;
  • (iii) beginning July 1, 2022, selling or offering for sale within the Commonwealth any cosmetic, if the cosmetics manufacturer knows or reasonably should know that the cosmetic or any component thereof was developed or manufactured using cosmetic animal testing that was conducted on or after January 1, 2022.”

Civil penalties will be applied to violations (up to $5,000 and an additional $1,000 for each day the violation continues).

There are four exceptions to this ban. Prohibitions do not apply to cosmetics for which the animal testing was:

  • Required by a federal or state regulatory authority and if:
    • (i) the test ingredient is in wide use and cannot be replaced by another ingredient (capable of performing similar function;
    • (ii) a specific human health problem is substantiated that justifies the need to conduct such animal testing (supported by a detail research protocol);
    • (iii) and does not exist an alternative testing method accepted for the relevant purpose (by the federal/state regulatory agency).
  • Required by a foreign jurisdiction or foreign regulatory agency, and conducted outside the U.S.
    • No evidence derived from such test shall be relied upon to substantiate the safety of the cosmetics sold in Virginia.
  • Conducted on any product/ingredient subject to the requirements of Subchapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.); or
  • Required by a federal, state, or foreign regulatory agency for a purpose unrelated to cosmetics (subjected to conditions).

This ban in the state of Virginia is part of a greater effort to stop animal testing on a federal level. California, Nevada and Illinois are the three states that already banned the animal testing in cosmetic and personal care products. New York, Oregon, New Jersey, Maryland, Rhode Island and Hawaii are expected to pass similar laws.

Several other countries have also been making changes towards banning animal testing on cosmetic products and harmonizing its cosmetic regulations with the European Cosmetic Regulation ((EC) No 1223/2009).

References:

  1. Senate Bill No 1379 – Chapter 52, Humane Cosmetics Act – https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+ful+SB1379

further
reading

medical devices

Safety Reporting in Clinical Investigations: a Gap Analysis of Guidance Documents 

Safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices shall be performed in line with Article 80(2) of the EU MDR. On May 2020, it was published the MDCG 2020-10/1, outlining the procedures for safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices under the EU MDR. However, on October 2022 the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published an updated version of the MDCG 2020-10/1, the MDCG 2020-10/1 Rev 1. This article highlights the updates included in the new revision, analysing the gaps between both documents.

Read More »
medical devices

Roles and Responsibilities of an Authorised Representative under EU MDR and IVDR 

If a medical device manufacturer is not established in a Member State, the devices can only be placed on the Union market if the manufacturer designates an authorised representative. The authorised representative plays a pivotal role in ensuring the compliance of the devices with EU regulation, serving as point of contact. The obligations and responsibilities of authorised representative are outlined on Article 11 of both MDR and IVDR, but clarification of relevant requirements is described in MDCG 2022-16 of October 2022.

Read More »
medical devices

Understanding the ISO Standards Lifecycle

ISO Standards cover a huge range of activities, representing the distilled wisdom of people with expertise in their subject matter and providing the regulators with a sound basis to develop better legislation. ISO Standards are diverse, addressing from the shoe size we wear to the quality of air we breathe. The medical device sector is no exception. ISO has many International Standards and guidance documents aimed at helping the sector ensure safe and effective medical devices while meeting the multitude of national, regional and international regulatory requirements. But how exactly is a Standard developed, reviewed and withdraw?

Read More »
medical devices

Amendments to the Transitional Provisions of the European Union MDR and IVDR

The proposed amendments aim to maintain patients’ access to a wide range of medical devices while ensuring the transition to the new framework. The ammendments proposal aims to extend the current transition period (Article 120 of the MDR), and it also deletes the ‘sell-off’ deadlines of both MDR and IVDR. The extension is staggered depending on the risk class of the device – until December 2027 for high-risk devices and December 2028 for medium and lower-risk devices.

Read More »
medical devices

EU MDR – Proposal for Extension of Transition Period

The transition to MDR has been slower than anticipated by the European Commission. Insufficient capacity of notified bodies and the low level of preparedness of manufacturers led to a proposal for extension of current MDR transition period with deadlines depending on the risk class of the devices.

Read More »
medical devices

MDCG 2022-18 – EU MDR Article 97

EU MDR Article 97 may be a temporary solution to avoid disruption of supply of Medical Devices on the EU Market. The MDCG 2022-18 presents a uniform approach for application of MDR Article 97 on non-compliant legacy devices under the conditions set by the competent authorities, while limiting the impact on the supply of safe and effective devices.

Read More »
parfum_fragrance_allergen_1
cosmetic products

EU to set Labelling Requirements for 56 additional Fragrance Allergens in Cosmetic Products

World Trade Organization (WTO) has been notified by the European Commission of a draft amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as regards labelling of fragrance allergens in Cosmetic Products. The proposed date of adoption of the new regulation is expected to be in the first half of 2023 and the propose date of entry in force 20 days from the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New Amendments to the European Cosmetics Regulation – CMR Substances

The European Commission published the Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1531, which amends Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 in regards to the use in cosmetic products of certain substances classified as CMR. This amendment introduces new entries to Annex II and Annex III and revises an entry to Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.

Read More »