Virginia – The Fourth State to Ban Animal Testing in the U.S.
In the United States (U.S.), Virginia is the fourth state to ban animal testing in cosmetic products. The Governor of this state (Ralph Northam) has signed this month (March 2021) a bill and the ban will start on January 1st, 2022. The sale of cosmetics tested on animals will also be prohibited from July 1st, 2022.

SENATE BILL NO. 1379 – ANIMAL TESTING BAN

According to the Senate Bill No. 1379, starting January 1st, 2022, it will no longer be permitted to perform tests of cosmetic products on animals. Moreover, beginning July 1st, 2022, the sale of cosmetics tested on animals will also be banned.

The Humane Cosmetics Act “prohibits a cosmetics manufacturer from:

  • (i) conducting or contracting for cosmetic animal testing that occurs in the Commonwealth on or after January 1, 2022
  • (ii) manufacturing or importing to profit into the Commonwealth any cosmetic or ingredient thereof, if the cosmetics manufacturer knew or reasonably should have known that the cosmetic or any component thereof was developed or manufactured using cosmetic animal testing that was conducted on or after January 1, 2022;
  • (iii) beginning July 1, 2022, selling or offering for sale within the Commonwealth any cosmetic, if the cosmetics manufacturer knows or reasonably should know that the cosmetic or any component thereof was developed or manufactured using cosmetic animal testing that was conducted on or after January 1, 2022.”

Civil penalties will be applied to violations (up to $5,000 and an additional $1,000 for each day the violation continues).

There are four exceptions to this ban. Prohibitions do not apply to cosmetics for which the animal testing was:

  • Required by a federal or state regulatory authority and if:
    • (i) the test ingredient is in wide use and cannot be replaced by another ingredient (capable of performing similar function;
    • (ii) a specific human health problem is substantiated that justifies the need to conduct such animal testing (supported by a detail research protocol);
    • (iii) and does not exist an alternative testing method accepted for the relevant purpose (by the federal/state regulatory agency).
  • Required by a foreign jurisdiction or foreign regulatory agency, and conducted outside the U.S.
    • No evidence derived from such test shall be relied upon to substantiate the safety of the cosmetics sold in Virginia.
  • Conducted on any product/ingredient subject to the requirements of Subchapter V of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.); or
  • Required by a federal, state, or foreign regulatory agency for a purpose unrelated to cosmetics (subjected to conditions).

This ban in the state of Virginia is part of a greater effort to stop animal testing on a federal level. California, Nevada and Illinois are the three states that already banned the animal testing in cosmetic and personal care products. New York, Oregon, New Jersey, Maryland, Rhode Island and Hawaii are expected to pass similar laws.

Several other countries have also been making changes towards banning animal testing on cosmetic products and harmonizing its cosmetic regulations with the European Cosmetic Regulation ((EC) No 1223/2009).

References:

  1. Senate Bill No 1379 – Chapter 52, Humane Cosmetics Act – https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?211+ful+SB1379

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »