SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan
Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.
Picture of Marta Pinto

Marta Pinto

Regulatory Affairs Associate

BACKGROUND

Triclocarban and Triclosan are ingredients used widely as preservatives in cosmetics and personal care products. They are both included in Annex V (list of preservatives allowed in cosmetic products) of the EU Cosmetics Regulation No. 1223/2009.

Triclocarban (CAS number: 101-20-2) can be used as a preservative up to a concentration of 0.2% in ready for use preparation, subject to purity criteria (Annex V, Entry 23). This ingredient is also included in the list of substances which cosmetic products must not contain except subject to the restrictions laid down (Annex III, Entry 100). For use other than as a preservative, Triclocarban may be used in rinse-off products up to a maximum concentration of 1.5%, subject to purity criteria. 

Triclosan (CAS number: 3380-34-5) may be used as a preservative in cosmetics up to a concentration of 0.2% in mouthwashes and up to 0.3% in other products like toothpastes, hand soaps, body soaps, deodorants (non-spray), face powders, etc. (Annex V, Entry 25).

Both Triclosan and Triclocarban have been assessed several times by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). These SCCS opinions resulted in the existing regulatory measures that allow different concentration of these ingredients based on the type of product and function.

In early 2019, a priority list of 28 potential endocrine disruptors (not already covered by the bans of cosmetic regulation) was established by the European Commission. From these 28 substances, 14 were considered as higher priority (Group A) and the other 14 were included in the low priority group (Group B).

The public call for data for the considered higher priority substances, including Triclocarban and Triclosan was carried out in 2019, with stakeholders submitting scientific evidence to demonstrate the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan in cosmetic products. The European Commission requested the SCCS to carry out a safety assessment on these two substances considering the information provided (see previous post).

WHAT’S NEW?

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the SCCS presented its final scientific opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Based on all available information, including the potential endocrine effects of Triclocarban and Triclosan, the SCCS concluded that the use of Triclocarban as a preservative in dermally applied cosmetic products is safe up to a maximum concentration of 0.2% for both children and adults (0.5-18 years) and that this ingredient is also safe up to a maximum of 1.5% in rinse-off products for both children and adults (0.5-18 years) when used individually or in combination with a function other than preservative. However, the SCCS concluded that Triclocarban is not safe for adults and children in mouthwash, when used up to a maximum concentration of 0.2%, or in toothpaste for children below 6 years old.

According to the SCCS opinion, Triclosan is safe as a preservative when used individually or in combination up to a maximum concentration of 0.3% in toothpaste for both children and adults (0.5-18 years) but it is not safe when used in combination for children below 3 years old. Also, it is considered safe as a preservative in mouthwash at concentrations of 0.2% when used individually but not when used in combination, and not safe for children and adolescents at 0.2% even when used individually.

References:

1. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Scientific advice on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products. SCCS/1643/22 Final Scientific Advice

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »