Request for SCCS Scientific Opinion on Citral
The European Commission requested the SCCS to assess whether the derived safe use levels for Citral by the application of the QRA2 based on the induction of skin sensitization is adequate to protect consumers. A period of 9 months was set for issuing the scientific opinion.

CITRAL

Citral is a mixture of neral and geranial (monoterpene aldehydes) and is widely used as a fragrance and flavor ingredient in food, beverages and several cosmetic and household products. According to the European Cosmetics Regulation (No. 1223/2009), Citral is included in the list of substances which cosmetic products must not contain except subject to the restrictions laid down (Annex III, entry 70). The presence of this ingredient must be indicated in the list of ingredients when its concentration exceeds 0.001% in leave-on products and 0.01% in rinse-off formulations.

The European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) has assessed the safety of fragrance allergens in cosmetic products. The SCCS included Citral in the list of 13 allergens which are most frequently reported and well-recognized as consumer allergens.

REQUEST FOR A SCIENTIFIC OPINION ON CITRAL

The International Fragrance Association (IFRA) has developed and implemented a model for dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA). This methodology is based on thresholds (no effect or low effect levels) established in healthy human volunteers and/or in animal experiments and a set of safety factors is applied to derive ‘acceptable exposure level’.

In 2012, it was established the International Dialogue for the Evaluation of Allergens (IDEA) with the aim of improving the risk assessment of fragrance allergens. This project reviewed uncertainty factors, introduced dermal aggregate exposure for fragrance ingredients, resulting in the QRA2 methodology. In 2018, the SCCS issued an opinion stating that it was not yet possible to use the QRA2 to establish a concentration at which induction of sensitization of fragrance is unlikely to occur.

IFRA submitted in 2021 a dossier on derived safe use levels for Citral, by applying the refined QRA2 methodology based on the induction of skin sensitization. Following the new data, the Commission requested the SCCS to assess whether the derived safe use levels for Citral by the application of the QRA2 is adequate to protect consumers.

Two questions are asked to the SCCS:

  • In light of the data provided and taking under consideration the derived upper safe levels using QRA2 methodology for the sensitisation endpoint, does the SCCS consider Citral safe when used as a fragrance ingredient in cosmetic products up to the maximum concentrations provided in the dossier submission?
  • Does the SCCS have any further scientific concerns with regard to the use of QRA2 to derive safe upper levels for Citral or for fragrance allergens in general?

The SCCS accepted this mandate by written procedure on 16 Febuary 2022 and a deadline of 9 months was set.

If you wish to get more information on the safety of cosmetic ingredients, feel free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

References:

  1. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products.
  2. European Commission. Request for a scientific opinion on Citral (CAS No. 5392-40-5, EC No. 226-394-6) on sensitisation endpoint. 2022.
  3. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Opinion on Fragrance allergens in cosmetic products. SCCS/1459/11. 2012.

further
reading

cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »
cosmetic products

UK proposes ban of wet wipes containing plastic 

The UK has proposed, on April 24, 2024, a regulation titled The Environmental Protection (Wet Wipes Containing Plastic) (England) Regulations 2024, to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The regulation aims to eliminate the supply and sale of plastic-containing wet wipes, including cosmetic ones. The public can offer comments on the draft until June 23, 2024, with adoption expected in September of the same year.

Read More »
news & updates

SCCS preliminary opinion on Citral sensitization endpoint

Ingredients: CITRAL

Date of publication: 27/03/2024

On March 27 2024, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on the safety of Citral in cosmetic products. The deadline for comments is set to June 2, 2024.

Read More »
medical devices

Safety Reporting in Clinical Investigations: a Gap Analysis of Guidance Documents 

Safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices shall be performed in line with Article 80(2) of the EU MDR. On May 2020, it was published the MDCG 2020-10/1, outlining the procedures for safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices under the EU MDR. However, on October 2022 the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published an updated version of the MDCG 2020-10/1, the MDCG 2020-10/1 Rev 1. This article highlights the updates included in the new revision, analysing the gaps between both documents.

Read More »
medical devices

Roles and Responsibilities of an Authorised Representative under EU MDR and IVDR 

If a medical device manufacturer is not established in a Member State, the devices can only be placed on the Union market if the manufacturer designates an authorised representative. The authorised representative plays a pivotal role in ensuring the compliance of the devices with EU regulation, serving as point of contact. The obligations and responsibilities of authorised representative are outlined on Article 11 of both MDR and IVDR, but clarification of relevant requirements is described in MDCG 2022-16 of October 2022.

Read More »
medical devices

Understanding the ISO Standards Lifecycle

ISO Standards cover a huge range of activities, representing the distilled wisdom of people with expertise in their subject matter and providing the regulators with a sound basis to develop better legislation. ISO Standards are diverse, addressing from the shoe size we wear to the quality of air we breathe. The medical device sector is no exception. ISO has many International Standards and guidance documents aimed at helping the sector ensure safe and effective medical devices while meeting the multitude of national, regional and international regulatory requirements. But how exactly is a Standard developed, reviewed and withdraw?

Read More »