Request for SCCS Scientific Opinion on Citral
The European Commission requested the SCCS to assess whether the derived safe use levels for Citral by the application of the QRA2 based on the induction of skin sensitization is adequate to protect consumers. A period of 9 months was set for issuing the scientific opinion.

CITRAL

Citral is a mixture of neral and geranial (monoterpene aldehydes) and is widely used as a fragrance and flavor ingredient in food, beverages and several cosmetic and household products. According to the European Cosmetics Regulation (No. 1223/2009), Citral is included in the list of substances which cosmetic products must not contain except subject to the restrictions laid down (Annex III, entry 70). The presence of this ingredient must be indicated in the list of ingredients when its concentration exceeds 0.001% in leave-on products and 0.01% in rinse-off formulations.

The European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) has assessed the safety of fragrance allergens in cosmetic products. The SCCS included Citral in the list of 13 allergens which are most frequently reported and well-recognized as consumer allergens.

REQUEST FOR A SCIENTIFIC OPINION ON CITRAL

The International Fragrance Association (IFRA) has developed and implemented a model for dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA). This methodology is based on thresholds (no effect or low effect levels) established in healthy human volunteers and/or in animal experiments and a set of safety factors is applied to derive ‘acceptable exposure level’.

In 2012, it was established the International Dialogue for the Evaluation of Allergens (IDEA) with the aim of improving the risk assessment of fragrance allergens. This project reviewed uncertainty factors, introduced dermal aggregate exposure for fragrance ingredients, resulting in the QRA2 methodology. In 2018, the SCCS issued an opinion stating that it was not yet possible to use the QRA2 to establish a concentration at which induction of sensitization of fragrance is unlikely to occur.

IFRA submitted in 2021 a dossier on derived safe use levels for Citral, by applying the refined QRA2 methodology based on the induction of skin sensitization. Following the new data, the Commission requested the SCCS to assess whether the derived safe use levels for Citral by the application of the QRA2 is adequate to protect consumers.

Two questions are asked to the SCCS:

  • In light of the data provided and taking under consideration the derived upper safe levels using QRA2 methodology for the sensitisation endpoint, does the SCCS consider Citral safe when used as a fragrance ingredient in cosmetic products up to the maximum concentrations provided in the dossier submission?
  • Does the SCCS have any further scientific concerns with regard to the use of QRA2 to derive safe upper levels for Citral or for fragrance allergens in general?

The SCCS accepted this mandate by written procedure on 16 Febuary 2022 and a deadline of 9 months was set.

If you wish to get more information on the safety of cosmetic ingredients, feel free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

References:

  1. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products.
  2. European Commission. Request for a scientific opinion on Citral (CAS No. 5392-40-5, EC No. 226-394-6) on sensitisation endpoint. 2022.
  3. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Opinion on Fragrance allergens in cosmetic products. SCCS/1459/11. 2012.

further
reading

medical devices

Safety Reporting in Clinical Investigations: a Gap Analysis of Guidance Documents 

Safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices shall be performed in line with Article 80(2) of the EU MDR. On May 2020, it was published the MDCG 2020-10/1, outlining the procedures for safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices under the EU MDR. However, on October 2022 the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published an updated version of the MDCG 2020-10/1, the MDCG 2020-10/1 Rev 1. This article highlights the updates included in the new revision, analysing the gaps between both documents.

Read More »
medical devices

Roles and Responsibilities of an Authorised Representative under EU MDR and IVDR 

If a medical device manufacturer is not established in a Member State, the devices can only be placed on the Union market if the manufacturer designates an authorised representative. The authorised representative plays a pivotal role in ensuring the compliance of the devices with EU regulation, serving as point of contact. The obligations and responsibilities of authorised representative are outlined on Article 11 of both MDR and IVDR, but clarification of relevant requirements is described in MDCG 2022-16 of October 2022.

Read More »
medical devices

Understanding the ISO Standards Lifecycle

ISO Standards cover a huge range of activities, representing the distilled wisdom of people with expertise in their subject matter and providing the regulators with a sound basis to develop better legislation. ISO Standards are diverse, addressing from the shoe size we wear to the quality of air we breathe. The medical device sector is no exception. ISO has many International Standards and guidance documents aimed at helping the sector ensure safe and effective medical devices while meeting the multitude of national, regional and international regulatory requirements. But how exactly is a Standard developed, reviewed and withdraw?

Read More »
medical devices

Amendments to the Transitional Provisions of the European Union MDR and IVDR

The proposed amendments aim to maintain patients’ access to a wide range of medical devices while ensuring the transition to the new framework. The ammendments proposal aims to extend the current transition period (Article 120 of the MDR), and it also deletes the ‘sell-off’ deadlines of both MDR and IVDR. The extension is staggered depending on the risk class of the device – until December 2027 for high-risk devices and December 2028 for medium and lower-risk devices.

Read More »
medical devices

EU MDR – Proposal for Extension of Transition Period

The transition to MDR has been slower than anticipated by the European Commission. Insufficient capacity of notified bodies and the low level of preparedness of manufacturers led to a proposal for extension of current MDR transition period with deadlines depending on the risk class of the devices.

Read More »
medical devices

MDCG 2022-18 – EU MDR Article 97

EU MDR Article 97 may be a temporary solution to avoid disruption of supply of Medical Devices on the EU Market. The MDCG 2022-18 presents a uniform approach for application of MDR Article 97 on non-compliant legacy devices under the conditions set by the competent authorities, while limiting the impact on the supply of safe and effective devices.

Read More »
parfum_fragrance_allergen_1
cosmetic products

EU to set Labelling Requirements for 56 additional Fragrance Allergens in Cosmetic Products

World Trade Organization (WTO) has been notified by the European Commission of a draft amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as regards labelling of fragrance allergens in Cosmetic Products. The proposed date of adoption of the new regulation is expected to be in the first half of 2023 and the propose date of entry in force 20 days from the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New Amendments to the European Cosmetics Regulation – CMR Substances

The European Commission published the Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1531, which amends Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 in regards to the use in cosmetic products of certain substances classified as CMR. This amendment introduces new entries to Annex II and Annex III and revises an entry to Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.

Read More »