Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PPRC) under MDR & IVDR
The EU Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR) and the EU In Vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation (EU IVDR) require all Manufacturers and Authorized Representatives to have a designated employee in their company who is responsible for regulatory compliance with the applicable MDR or IVDR requirements, the Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PRRC).

WHAT ARE THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PRRC?

The person responsible for regulatory compliance, permanently and continuously at disposal, shall at least be responsible for ensuring:

  1. the conformity of the devices is appropriately checked, in accordance with the quality management system (QMS) under which the devices are manufactured, before a device is released;
  2. the technical documentation and the EU declaration of conformity are drawn up and kept up-to-date;
  3. the post-market surveillance obligations are complied with in accordance with Article 10(10) of MDR and Article 10(9) of IVDR;
  4. the reporting obligations referred to in Articles 87-91 of MDR and Articles 82-86 of IVDR;
  5. in the case of investigational devices, the statement referred to in Section 4.1 of Chapter II of Annex XV of the MDR and Section 4.1 of Annex XIV of the IVDR.

The Manufacturer or Authorized Representative may appoint more than one PRRC. In this case, their respective areas of responsibility shall be put down in writing.

WHAT ARE THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE PRRC?

Article 15(1) of both MDR and IVDR require the PRRC to have either:

  • A diploma, certificate or other evidence of formal qualification, awarded on completion of a university degree or of a course of study recognized as equivalent by the Member State concerned, in law, medicine, pharmacy, engineering or another relevant scientific discipline, and at least one year of professional experience in regulatory affairs or in quality management systems relating to medical devices or in vitro diagnostics.
  • 4 years of professional experience in regulatory affairs or in quality management systems in the medical device or in vitro diagnostic device fields.

The MDCG Guidance 2019-7 specifies that the professional experience in regulatory affairs or quality management should be related to the EU requirements in the field. Additionally, for manufacturers located outside the EU, it must be assumed that the PRRC should also be located outside the EU. On the other hand, for manufacturers located in the EU, it must be assumed that the PRRC should also be located in the EU.

It is important to note that the PRRC does not replace the manufacturer’s European Authorized Representative (EC REP) as these are two separate roles with different responsibilities and obligations under the MDR and IVDR.

The PRRC appointed should be an employee of the organization. Micro and small enterprises, e.g., with fewer than 50 full-time employees and less than €10 million in global sales are not required to have the PRRC within their organization and can outsource this role to a third party, while ensuring that such person is permanently and continuously at their disposal.

If you wish to know more information about the EU Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR) and the EU In Vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation (EU IVDR) feel free to contact us at info@criticalcatalyst.com.

References:

  1. Regulation (UE) 2017/745, on medical devices
  2. Regulation (UE) 2017/746, on in vitro diagnostic medical devices
  3. MDCG 2019-7 – Guidance on Article 15 of the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and in vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation (IVDR) regarding a ‘person responsible for regulatory compliance’ (PRRC)

further
reading

cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »
cosmetic products

UK proposes ban of wet wipes containing plastic 

The UK has proposed, on April 24, 2024, a regulation titled The Environmental Protection (Wet Wipes Containing Plastic) (England) Regulations 2024, to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The regulation aims to eliminate the supply and sale of plastic-containing wet wipes, including cosmetic ones. The public can offer comments on the draft until June 23, 2024, with adoption expected in September of the same year.

Read More »
news & updates

SCCS preliminary opinion on Citral sensitization endpoint

Ingredients: CITRAL

Date of publication: 27/03/2024

On March 27 2024, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on the safety of Citral in cosmetic products. The deadline for comments is set to June 2, 2024.

Read More »
medical devices

Safety Reporting in Clinical Investigations: a Gap Analysis of Guidance Documents 

Safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices shall be performed in line with Article 80(2) of the EU MDR. On May 2020, it was published the MDCG 2020-10/1, outlining the procedures for safety reporting in clinical investigations of medical devices under the EU MDR. However, on October 2022 the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) published an updated version of the MDCG 2020-10/1, the MDCG 2020-10/1 Rev 1. This article highlights the updates included in the new revision, analysing the gaps between both documents.

Read More »
medical devices

Roles and Responsibilities of an Authorised Representative under EU MDR and IVDR 

If a medical device manufacturer is not established in a Member State, the devices can only be placed on the Union market if the manufacturer designates an authorised representative. The authorised representative plays a pivotal role in ensuring the compliance of the devices with EU regulation, serving as point of contact. The obligations and responsibilities of authorised representative are outlined on Article 11 of both MDR and IVDR, but clarification of relevant requirements is described in MDCG 2022-16 of October 2022.

Read More »
medical devices

Understanding the ISO Standards Lifecycle

ISO Standards cover a huge range of activities, representing the distilled wisdom of people with expertise in their subject matter and providing the regulators with a sound basis to develop better legislation. ISO Standards are diverse, addressing from the shoe size we wear to the quality of air we breathe. The medical device sector is no exception. ISO has many International Standards and guidance documents aimed at helping the sector ensure safe and effective medical devices while meeting the multitude of national, regional and international regulatory requirements. But how exactly is a Standard developed, reviewed and withdraw?

Read More »