Medical Devices – Brazil Regulatory Framework
Brazil represents the biggest market for medical devices in South America. Selling and marketing medical devices in Brazil requires several actions and compliance with legislation and standards, which can be a complex process.

GENERAL BRAZILIAN RULES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES

According to the Brazilian National Agency of Health Surveillance (ANVISA), a medical device is “a healthcare product, such as equipment, devices, materials, articles, or systems for medical,  odontological, or laboratory use or application, intended for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, or anticonception and that does not use pharmacological, immunological, or metabolic means to fulfill its main function in human beings, but can have its functions assisted by such means”.

Medical devices in Brazil must be registered in ANVISA, in accordance with the Brazilian Resolution RDC. No. 185. Manufacturers or importers of such products must submit to ANVISA all the documents required for the registration as well as for its maintenance, revalidation or cancellation. After evaluating all the documentation, ANVISA publishes its decision on the Brazilian Official Gazette (DOU).

The medical device company must be located in Brazil or it will need a licensed third-party company to be the Brazilian registration holder (BRH), which will hold the registration certificate title. Registration of medical devices is valid for 5 years and after that period it may be successively revalidated for the same period.

According to the risk they represent to consumers, patients, users or third parties involved, medical devices are classified as Class I, II, III or IV. In case of doubts in the classification, ANVISA is the one deciding about the classification. Class II devices have a shorter and simplified registration process (known as ‘Cadastro’), whereas Class III and Class IV need to go through a similar path but a little more complex and with some variants (known as ‘Registro’). Medical devices classified as Class III and IV need to be subjected to Brazilian GMP inspections, which are carried out by ANVISA. As an alternative, manufacturers can partake in the Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP). MDSAP audit reports are accepted as a substitute for routine inspections and may be used for medical device registration in ANVISA.  Since May 2019 (RDC 270/2019), Class I medical devices only need a formal notification to ANVISA and do not need to submit to full ‘Cadastro’ approval (registration is not subject to technical review). This 2019 Resolution main goal was to help ANVISA to focus more on high-risk medical products. On the other hand, companies should make sure they have qualified regulatory team so they can ensure compliance with regulations.

The following medical devices are exempt from registration at ANVISA:

  • Medical devices intended for clinical research, when in compliance with legal provisions of the competent health surveillance authority on the performance of this activity, prohibiting such products to be commercialized and used for other purposes.
  • New presentations of a medical device set already registered and in intact individual packaging, provided that its label and instructions for use contain the information about the registration of the corresponding medical devices.
  • Accessories exclusively manufactured to be part of a medical device with a registration whose technical report has information on such accessories.

INMETRO CERTIFICATION

The National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO) is the government body responsible for the implementation of measurement, safety and quality standards for electrical and electronic products. This National Institute is in charge of the notification of proposed technical regulations to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and acts as the national enquiry point under the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). It guides the activities of accreditation, inspection, testing and certification bodies in Brazil. A broad range of products require INMETRO certification accompanied by inspection, including medical devices (electromedical, regardless of their class).

INMETRO certification (conducted in an INMETRO-certified testing laboratory) must be done prior to ANVISA approval, as it is part of the medical product’s technical documentation required for submission. A product that is certified by an INMETRO-accredited Certification Body ensures that such product is compliant with Brazilian regulations and required safety standards. INMETRO certification is valid for 5 years and may be renewed for additional 5.

Placing and marketing a medical device in Brazil market can be a tough task. With an experienced team located both in the EU and Brazil, Critical Catalyst is available to assist your company in any part of the process, making it easier and assuring compliance with the applicable regulatory requirements.

References:

  1. Ministério da Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) – Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada – RDC No. 185, de 22 de Outubro de 2001.
  2. Ministério da Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) – Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada – RDC Nº 27, de 21 de Junho de 2011.
  3. Ministério da Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) – Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada – RDC Nº 270, de 28 de Fevereiro de 2019.
  4. Ministério do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio Exterior, Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Normalização e Qualidade Industrial-INMETRO – Portaria nº 350, de 06 de setembro de 2010.

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »