California toxic-free cosmetics act moves forward in state assembly
On May 14th, AB 2762, the Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act, was passed out by the California State Assembly Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials. If adopted, the Act would ban 12 chemicals from cosmetics placed in the California market.

On May 14th 2020, AB 2762, the Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act, was passed out by the California State Assembly Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials, by unanimous vote.

Largely in line with bill AB 495 considered in 2019, this bill would, commencing January 1, 2025, prohibit a person or entity from manufacturing, selling, delivering, holding, or offering for sale in commerce any cosmetic product that contains any of several specified intentionally added ingredients, except under specified circumstances.

If adopted, the Act would ban 12 chemicals from cosmetics, including:

1. Dibutyl phthalate (CAS no. 84-74-2)

2. Diethylhexyl phthalate (CAS no. 117-81-7)

3. Formaldehyde (CAS no. 50-00-0)

4. Paraformaldehyde (CAS no. 30525-89-4)

5. Methylene glycol (CAS no. 463-57-0)

6. Quaternium-15 (CAS no. 51229-78-8)

7. Mercury (CAS no. 7439-97-6)

8. Isobutylparaben (CAS no. 4247-02-3)

9. Isopropylparaben (CAS no. 4191-73-5)

10. m-Phenylenediamine and its salts (CAS no. 108-45-2)

11. o-Phenylenediamine and its salts (CAS no. 95-54-5)

12. Long-chain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their salts.

All of these chemicals are currently banned from cosmetic products sold in the European Union but are legally being used in cosmetic products sold in California and throughout the United States.

References:

1. Assembly Bill No. 2762, an act to add Section 111663 to the Health and Safety Code, relating to cosmetics https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB2762 

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »