Brazil – Class II Medical Devices – New Resolution
A new Resolution of the Collegiate Board of Directors (RDC No. 423/2020) has been published by Brazil’s National Agency of Health Surveillance (ANVISA). This new Resolution announces the elimination of the ‘Cadastro’ pathway regarding the registration of medical devices (Class II) and IVDs, substituting it with a notification registration system.
Picture of Liliana Teles

Liliana Teles

Regulatory Affairs Manager

MEDICAL DEVICES LEGAL FRAMEWORK IN BRAZIL

Medical devices placed in the Brazilian market must be registered at Brazil’s National Agency of Health Surveillance (ANVISA), in accordance with the Brazilian Resolution RDC. No. 185. Manufacturers or importers of such products need to submit to ANVISA all the documents required for their registration as well as for their alteration, revalidation or cancellation. After evaluating all the documentation for registration, alteration, revalidation or cancellation, ANVISA publishes its decision on the Brazilian Official Gazette (DOU).

According to the risk they represent to consumers, patients, operators or third parties involved, medical products are classified as Class I, II, III or IV. In case of doubts in the classification, ANVISA is the one classifying the medical device.

Until recently, Class II medical devices were subject to a short registration process called ‘Cadastro’ (pre-market approval). Manufacturers of Class II medical devices (and some Class I) were requested to provide technical dossiers, labelling materials and proposed indications of use (IFU) documents to their Brazilian Registration Holder (BRH) representative in the country.

NEW RESOLUTION ON MEDICAL DEVICES CLASS II

According to the new Resolution published in September 2020, as it happens with Class I medical devices, Class II devices only require a formal notification (‘Notificação’) and no longer need an approval by ANVISA before entering the market. This notification shall be done using a special form available at ANVISA’s website. Now, manufacturers do not need to submit a technical dossier but should have these documentation available upon request (in case of an inspection by ANVISA). The main goal of the new Resolution is to help ANVISA to focus on high-risk medical products.

IVDs (Class I and II) may now also enter the Brazilian market via the notification pathway.

Class II medical devices that are already registered in ANVISA do not require a re-validation (except if changes are requested).

References:

  1. Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada – RDC Nº 423, de 16 se Setembro 2020. Available at: https://pesquisa.in.gov.br/imprensa/jsp/visualiza/index.jsp?data=18/09/2020&jornal=515&pagina=110&totalArquivos=139
  2. Ministério da Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) – Resolution RDC No. 185, of October 22nd, 2001. Available at: https://www.emergobyul.com/sites/default/files/file/rdc_185_2001_classification_and_registration_requirements_of_medical_products_0.pdf
  3. Ministério da Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) – Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada – RDC Nº 270, de 28 de Fevereiro de 2019. Available at: http://rapassarini.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/RESOLUC%CC%A7A%CC%83O-DA-DIRETORIA-COLEGIADA-RDC-N%C2%BA-270-DE-28-DE-FEVEREIRO-DE-2019-Dia%CC%81rio-Oficial-da-Unia%CC%83o-Imprensa-Nacional.pdf
  4. Ministério da Saúde, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) – Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada – RDC Nº 27, de 21 de Junho de 2011. Available at: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2011/rdc0027_21_06_2011.pdf

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »