SCCS Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products 
Ingredients: ALUMINIUM

Date of publication: 27/03/2024

On March 27 2024, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products.

BACKGROUND

Aluminium (Al) and Al compounds are used in a variety of cosmetic products, predominantly in deodorants, antiperspirants, lipsticks, and toothpastes. Several Al compounds are regulated in different entries of the Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009. 

In 2013, the SCCS was mandated to evaluate the possible risk for human health arising from the presence of Al in cosmetics. In its opinion in 2014, the Commission concluded that, because of the lack of data on dermal penetration, the risk assessment could not be performed. 

After receiving new information regarding dermal penetration, at its plenary meeting on 3-4 March 2020, the SCCS adopted its final Opinion SCCS/1613/19 and in March 2021 an addendum to this Opinion was published. In the addendum, the SCCS concluded that the use of aluminium compounds is safe at the equivalent aluminium concentrations up to: 

  • 6,25 % in non-spray deodorants or non-spray antiperspirants 
  • 10,60 % in spray deodorants or spray antiperspirants 
  • 2,65 % in toothpaste 
  • 14 % in lipstick

Following the discussion at the Cosmetics Working Group held on 25 June 2020 and in light of the comments received on the use of Aluminium compounds in a variety of products other than deodorants, antiperspirants, lipsticks and toothpastes, the Commission considered opportune to request from industry to submit additional information on the ‘other product categories’ and on the aggregate exposure not only from cosmetics. In March 2021, industry submitted a dossier focusing on the aggregate exposure to aluminium concerning the European population when considering the use of cosmetics and personal care products, medicines (e.g., antacids) and dietary intake and the SCCS was requested to perform a safety assessment in view of the new information provided. 

The current request concerns the update of use concentrations based on submission IV by the Aluminium consortium, which comprises an amendment to the probabilistic exposure assessment report. 

WHAT’S NEW?

The SCCS considers that aluminium compounds are safe when used: 

  • in non-sprayable product categories at the maximum levels 
  • in sprayable products, at the maximum levels for the total formulation (i.e. including propellant), provided that the percentage of particles/droplets with a diameter of less than 10 μm does not exceed 20% of the total aerosolised particles/droplets. 
  • in talc due to the fact that aluminium is not bioavailable from talc up to a level of 2% 

This Opinion does not cover sunscreen aerosol sprays. 

As mentioned in Opinion SCCS/1644/22, aluminium does not belong to substances classified as CMR 1A or B, so that only exposure from cosmetic uses was considered in this safety assessment with the exposure assessment based on maximum use levels for cosmetic ingredients. However, as evaluated in SCCS/1644/22, aggregated exposure from cosmetics and food may exceed safe limits for consumers at the highest exposure ranges. 

It needs to be noted that this Opinion specifically covers the risk to consumers from exposure to aluminium from cosmetic products. As such, this Opinion does not address the safety of the use of talc in cosmetic products beyond the safety of the aluminium content in talc. 

These conclusions are aligned with the ones presented in the preliminary opinion on December 14, 2023. 

Additionally, this opinion does not apply to nano forms of aluminium for which a separate specific safety assessment would be needed.

REFERENCES

Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) – Opinion on the safety of aluminium in cosmetic products – Submission IV. Preliminary version of 14 December 2023, final version of 27 March 2024, SCCS/1662/23 

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »