European Commission requests SCCS opinion on Benzophenone-4
Ingredients: BENZOPHENONE-4

Date of publication: 17/04/2023

The European Commission has requested the SCCS to assess the safety of Benzophenone-4. The SCCS approved this mandate on 17 April 2023, and the Committee has now nine months to deliver its Opinion.

The European Commission has requested the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) to assess the safety of Benzophenone-4 (CAS No.4065-45-6, EC No. 223-772-2). The SCCS approved this mandate by written procedure on 17 April 2023, and the Committee has now nine months to deliver its Opinion.

Background

On 7 November 2018, the European Commission adopted the review of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products regarding substances with endocrine-disrupting (ED) properties.

In this review, the European Commission commited to establishing a priority list of potential EDs not already covered by bans or restrictions in the Cosmetics Regulation for their subsequent safety assessment. A priority list of 28 potential EDs in cosmetics was consolidated in early 2019 based on input provided through stakeholder consultation. The Commission carried out a public call for data in 2019 for 14 substances (Group A) and a second call in 2021 for 10 substances (Group B) in preparation for the safety assessment of these substances.

Benzophenone-4 (CAS No. 4065-45-6, EC No. 223-772-2) is one of the above-mentioned substances for which the call for data took place.

Benzophenone-4 with the chemical name ‘2-Hydroxy4-methoxybenzophenone-5-sulphonic acid’ is currently regulated as a UV-filter in sunscreen products in a concentration up to 5% (Annex VI/22). Benzophenone-4 absorbs UV light across a broad range of UV wavelengths and, therefore, protects the skin from damage by UVB and UVA light. In addition, Benzophenone-4 is also reported with the functions of UV-stabiliser and UV-absorber protecting cosmetic formulations against sunlight.

Benzophenone-4 has been subject to a safety evaluation by SCCNFP in 1999, where the committee concluded that ‘2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone-5-sulphonic acid can be used safely in cosmetic sunscreen formulations at a maximum concentration of 5%, expressed as acid’ and proposed no further restrictions or conditions for its use in cosmetic products.

Questions to be addressed by the SCC

The European Commission requested the SCCS to carry out a safety assessment on Benzophenone-4 in view of the information provided.

  1. In light of the data provided and taking under consideration the concerns related to the potentially endocrine disrupting properties of Benzophenone-4, does the SCCS consider Benzophenone-4 safe when used as UV-filter in cosmetic products up to a maximum concentration of 5%?
  2. Alternatively, what is according to the SCCS the maximum concentration considered safe for use of Benzophenone-4 in cosmetic products?
  3. Does the SCCS have any further scientific concerns with regard to the use of Benzophenone-4 in cosmetic products?

References:

Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) – Request for a scientific opinion on Benzophenone-4 (CAS No. 4065-45-6, EC No. 223-772-2)

other REGULATORY UPDATES

UK Responsible Person Labelling Deadline Extension

RESPONSIBLE PERSON

Date of application: 31/12/2025

The UK Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) have reviewed the requirement to label the product with the UK Responsible Person and have decided to extend this transitional provision for a total period of five years, until 31 December 2025.

Read More »

SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan

Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Read More »

Regulation (EU) 2022/692 – OMNIBUS ACT VI – New and Updated Classification of Cosmetic Ingredients

Ingredients: BENZOPHENONE, TEOPHYLLINE, MELAMINE, AZADIRACHTA EXTRACTS, TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE TRIACRYLATE, PENTETIC ACID, PENTASODIUM PENTETATE

Date of publication: 03/05/2022

Date of application: 01/12/2023

The Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 includes new or updated classification for 12 chemicals that may be used as cosmetic ingredients. Seven out of these 12 are now classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction (CMR) and are banned from cosmetic products marketed in the EU.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?

French Anti-Waste Law – Impact in Cosmetics Packaging and Labelling

PACKAGING WASTE MANAGEMENT

Date of application: 01/01/2023, with a transition period until 09/03/2023 for packaging produced or imported before 09/09/2022.

The Loi relative à la lute contre le gaspillage et a l’économie circulaire (Anti-Waste for a circular economy) has come officially into force in France in 2020. From January 2023 the requirements of the law became mandatory, including specific symbols on the packaging or labelling of cosmetic products.

Read More »

Regulation (EU) 2022/692 – OMNIBUS ACT VI – New and Updated Classification of Cosmetic Ingredients

Ingredients: BENZOPHENONE, TEOPHYLLINE, MELAMINE, AZADIRACHTA EXTRACTS, TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE TRIACRYLATE, PENTETIC ACID, PENTASODIUM PENTETATE

Date of publication: 03/05/2022

Date of application: 01/12/2023

The Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 includes new or updated classification for 12 chemicals that may be used as cosmetic ingredients. Seven out of these 12 are now classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction (CMR) and are banned from cosmetic products marketed in the EU.

Read More »

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »