Common Specifications for Class D In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices
On 5 of July of 2022, the European Commission published the implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1107 of 4 July 2022 laying down common specifications for certain class D in vitro diagnostic medical devices in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/746.

For certain class D in vitro diagnostic medical devices, there are no harmonised standards to respond to some requirements of Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2017/746. However, there is a need to address public health concerns as they can pose significant risks for public health and patient safety. Therefore, it is appropriate to adopt common specifications for those devices in respect of those requirements.

The common technical specifications under the Directive 98/79/EC were set out in Commission Decision 2002/364/EC. Once the Regulation (EU) 2017/746 replaced the Directive 98/79/EC, some of those common technical specifications have to be updated to reflect the current state of the art.

Entry into force and date of application

Regulation (EU) 2022/1107:

  • Enters into force in 25 July 2022
  • Applies from 25 July 2024

Transitional provisions

To ensure a continuous high level of safety and performance of devices, as a transitional measure, it is presumed that devices in conformity with Decision 2002/364/EC are in conformity with the requirements for certain performance characteristics set out in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 until 25 July 2024.

Devices that are not in conformity with the common technical specifications set out in Decision 2002/364/EC should adopt solutions to ensure an equivalent level of safety and performance.

Devices that are in conformity with the common specifications set out in Regulation (EU) 2022/1107 are presumed to be in conformity with the performance requirements referred in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/746.

Which requirements of Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 are covered by the common specifications?

Regulation (EU) 2022/1107 lays down common specifications for certain class D in vitro diagnostic medical devices in respect to the following performance requirements set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/746:

  • Section 9.1, points (a) and (b)
  • Section 9.3
  • Section 9.4, point (a)

List of annexes of Regulation (EU) 2022/1107

  • Annex I – general common specifications for devices covered by Annexes II to XIII
  • Annex II – common specifications for devices intended for detection of blood group antigens in the ABO, Rh, Kell, Duffy and Kidd blood group systems.
  • Annex III – common specifications for devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • Annex IV – common specifications for devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) infection.
  • Annex V – common specifications for devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
  • Annex VI – common specifications for devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.
  • Annex VII – common specifications for devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection.
  • Annex VIII – common specifications for devices intended for detection of markers of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD).
  • Annex IX – common specifications for devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection.
  • Annex X – common specifications for devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of Epstein-Barr virus infection (EBV).
  • Annex XI – common specifications for devices intended for detection of markers of Treponema pallidum infection.
  • Annex XII – common specifications for devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of Trypanosoma cruzi infection.
  • Annex XIII – common specifications for devices intended for detection or quantification of markers of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

further
reading

cosmetic products

United Kingdom Restricts the Use of BHT in Cosmetic Products

The United Kingdom has taken a significant step in regulating the use of Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) in cosmetic products. This move is crucial for distributors, manufacturers, and importers to ensure compliance and maintain the safety of their products in the UK market.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Great Britain Mandatory Classification List (MCL): cosmetic ingredients added.

On March 12, 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) updated the GB Mandatory Classification List (MCL) by adding 25 new chemical substances, as mandated by Article 37 of the GB Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This update impacts substances identified as cosmetic ingredients with proposed Carcinogen, Mutagen, or Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications under Article 15 of the UK Cosmetics Regulation (UKCR). Notably, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and its zinc salt, along with Dimethyltolylamine, are among those facing potential bans and additions to the UK Cosmetics Regulation’s Annex II. These changes will come into effect on September 2, 2025.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New coating for TiO2 (nano) – is it safe?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published the Preliminary Opinion on new coating for Titanium Dioxide (nano). It declared the data was not enough to draw conclusions regarding the safety of this alternative coating, as more evidence of similarity to other nanomaterials is necessary.

Read More »
cosmetic products

New EU cosmetic restrictions on Cyclic Volatile Methyl Siloxanes (cVMS)

Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) have raised environmental concerns because of their persistence and bioaccumulative properties. In light of these concerns, the European Union has extended restrictions on substances like D4, D5, and D6 in cosmetic products. New regulations will further limit the concentration of these compounds in both rinse-off and leave-on products, with compliance deadlines set for 2026 and 2027.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Citral under review: SCCS Preliminary Opinion

The SCCS was tasked by the European Commission to evaluate if the safety levels for Citral, determined through QRA2 based on skin sensitization induction, are sufficient to safeguard consumers. A preliminary opinion was released.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Are sunscreens with Benzophenone-4 safe?

Benzophenone-4 is commonly known as a UV-filter in cosmetic products. Learn what the final opinion of SCCS states about Benzophenone’s safety profile as a UV-filter in cosmetic products.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Is Aluminium in cosmetics safe for human health?

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the safety of Aluminium in cosmetic products. This follows a lengthy review process that began in 2013 when the SCCS was first mandated to evaluate the potential health risks of Aluminium (Al) and its compounds in cosmetics.

Read More »
cosmetic products

Silver in Cosmetics: SCCS preliminary opinion.

Ingredients: SILVER

The recent preliminary opinion from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) regarding silver in cosmetics is crucial for consumers and manufacturers. This article breaks down the key points, making it easier to understand the implications and stay informed.

Read More »
news & updates

EU Ecolabel adoption and recognition are on the rise

The Ecolabel certification is a comprehensive program focused on fostering sustainable practices. It evaluates products based on life cycle assessments, where every phase of said life cycle must abide by strict standards to attain the Ecolabel certification. The overarching objective of this certification is minimizing environmental harm from production or consumption activities.

Read More »