SCCS Final Opinion on Benzophenone-4 as used in cosmetic products
Ingredients: BENZOPHENONE-4

Date of publication: 27/03/2024

On March 27, 2024, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its Final Opinion on the use of UV-filter Benzophenone-4 in cosmetic products.

BACKGROUND

Benzophenone-4 (CAS No. 4065-45-6, EC No. 223-772-2) with the chemical name ‘2- 27 Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone-5-sulphonic acid’ is currently regulated in Annex VI (entry 22) of the European Cosmetics Regulation No. 1223/2009, as a UV-filter in sunscreen products in a concentration up to 5%.

Benzophenone-4 absorbs UV light across a broad range of UV wavelengths and, therefore, protects the skin from damage by UVB and UVA light. Benzophenone-4 is used in cosmetic products as UV-stabiliser and UV-absorber.

Benzophenone-4 has been subject to a safety evaluation by the Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products (SCCNFP) in 1999, where the committee concluded that ‘2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone-5-sulphonic acid can be used safely in cosmetic sunscreen formulations at a maximum concentration of 5%, expressed as acid’ and proposed ‘no further restrictions or conditions for its use in cosmetic products’.

In 2019, the European Commission issued a call for data on a list of potential substances with endocrine disrupting (ED) properties in cosmetics, including Benzophenone-4.

During the call for data, industry stakeholders submitted scientific evidence to demonstrate the safety of Benzophenone-4 as UV-filter in cosmetic products. The European Commission requested the SCCS to carry out a safety assessment on Benzophenone-4 in view of the information provided.

WHAT’S NEW?

In light of the information provided, the SCCS published its final opinion, concluding that Benzophenone-4 is safe when used as UV filter up to a maximum concentration of 5% in:

  • Sunscreens
  • Face and hand cream
  • All leave-on and rinse-off products (total dermal aggregate)
  • Lipstick
  • Sunscreen propellant spray and pump spray, when used separately or in combination (based on deterministic aggregated exposure).

Any additional use of Benzophenone-4, such as protectant for stabilising cosmetic formulations when exposed to light, should remain within the concentration mentioned above (i.e. 5%), taking into account the use as UV-filter.

The SCCS assessment did not cover the impact of Benzophenone-4 for the environment.

References:

Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) – Opinion on Benzophenone – 4 (CAS No. 4065-45-6, EC No. 223-772-2) as used in cosmetics products. Preliminary version of 14 December 2023, final version of 27 March 2024, SCCS/1660/23.

other REGULATORY UPDATES

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »

SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan

Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »