New harmonized classification proposals for 3 fragrance cosmetic ingredients
Ingredients: P-CYMENE, CYCLAMEN ALDEHYDE, 4-TERT-BUTYLDIHYDROCINNAMALDEHYDE
The European Chemicals Ageny (ECHA) received new harmonized classification and labelling (CLH) proposals for 3 fragrance cosmetic ingredients, which use may be at risk.

WHAT’S NEW?

The European Chemicals Ageny (ECHA) received new harmonized classification and labelling (CLH) proposals for 8 fragrance cosmetic ingredients, submitted by Sweden.

The following ingredients were initially proposed to be classified as Toxic to Reproduction category 1B (Repr. 1B, H360F – May damage fertility):

  • Cuminaldehyde, CAS 122-03-2 
  • P-Cymene, CAS 99-87-6
  • 3-(p-cumenyl)propionaldehyde, CAS 7775-00-0
  • Cyclamen Aldehyde, CAS 103-95-7
  • 4-tert-Butyldihydrocinnamaldehyde, CAS 18127-01-0 
  • Methyl 4-t-Butylbenzoate, CAS 26537-19-9
  • 4-t-Butyl Benzaldehyde, CAS 939-97-9
  • 4-tert-Butyltoluene, CAS 98-51-1

However, 5 of these proposals have been currently withdrawn:

  • Cuminaldehyde, CAS 122-03-2 
  • 3-(p-cumenyl)propionaldehyde, CAS 7775-00-0
  • Methyl 4-t-Butylbenzoate, CAS 26537-19-9
  • 4-t-Butyl Benzaldehyde, CAS 939-97-9
  • 4-tert-Butyltoluene, CAS 98-51-1

WHAT NOW?

Depending on the outcome of the ECHA’s Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) opinions regarding the proposed new harmonized classification and labelling, the future use of the following fragrance ingredients may be at risk:

  • P-Cymene, CAS 99-87-6
  • Cyclamen Aldehyde, CAS 103-95-7
  • 4-tert-Butyldihydrocinnamaldehyde, CAS 18127-01-0 

According to the EU Cosmetics Regulation No. 1223/2009, cosmetic ingredients classified as CMR (Carcinogenic, Mutagenic, Toxic to Reproduction) of categories 1A or 1B under Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, shall be prohibited.

References:

European Chemicals Agency – Registry of CLH intentions until outcome

other REGULATORY UPDATES

SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan

Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Read More »

Regulation (EU) 2022/1531 – OMNIBUS ACT V – applicable as of 17 December 2022

Ingredients: METHYL SALICYLATE, SODIUM HYDROXYMETHYLGLYCINATE, DBMC, MIBK

Date of publication: 15/09/2022

Date of application: 17/12/2022

The European Commission has published the Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1531, which amends the Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as regards the use in cosmetic products of certain substances classified as CMR, by adding new entries to Annex II and Annex III and revising an entry in Annex V.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?

French Anti-Waste Law – Impact in Cosmetics Packaging and Labelling

PACKAGING WASTE MANAGEMENT

Date of application: 01/01/2023, with a transition period until 09/03/2023 for packaging produced or imported before 09/09/2022.

The Loi relative à la lute contre le gaspillage et a l’économie circulaire (Anti-Waste for a circular economy) has come officially into force in France in 2020. From January 2023 the requirements of the law became mandatory, including specific symbols on the packaging or labelling of cosmetic products.

Read More »

SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan

Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Read More »

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »