Two ingredients used in nail modelling cosmetics will be prohibited in EU by the CMR Omnibus Act VII
Ingredients: DIMETHYLTOLYLAMINE, TRIMETHYLBENZOYL DIPHENYLPHOSPHINE OXIDE

Proposed date of adoption: 20 days from publication in the OJEU

The European Commission notified the WTO of the draft text for the 21st Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP) to the EU CLP Regulation. Two cosmetic nail modelling ingredients will be prohibited in EU.

At the beginning of March, 2023, the EU Commission notified the World Trade Organisation (WTO) of the draft text for the 21st Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP) to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation.

The draft ATP amends Annex VI of the EU CLP Regulation, including new Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (CMR) classifications relating to the following cosmetic ingredients used in nail cosmetic products:

  • Dimethyltolylamine, carcinogenic 1B – no current Annex entry in the EU Cosmetics Regulation
  • Trimethylbenzoyl diphenylphosphine oxide, reprotoxic 1B – currently listed in Annex III entry 311 of the EU Cosmetics Regulation

These ingredients were not defended by industry and will therefore be included in Annex II (prohibited substances) of the EU Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009 via the 7th CMR Omnibus Regulation.

The making available (off-shelf) deadline for products containing these substances will be 18 months after publication of the 21st ATP to CLP on the Official Journal of the European Union.

It is important to note that this new regulation will not automatically be included within the Great Britain CLP Regulation.  So currently, the announced bans will apply only in the European Union.

References:

1. World Trade Organization – Notification G/TBT/N/EU/957

other
REGULATORY UPDATES

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?