Spain revokes mandatory Green Dot labelling for packaging
Topic: Green Dot labelling in Spain

Date of publication: 27/12/2022

Date of application: 01/01/2025

Spanish Royal Decree 1055/2022 will apply as of January 1, 2025, introducing several new requirements on packaging.

On 27 December, 2022, Spain issued the Royal Decree 1055/2022 on packaging and packaging waste intended to further the development of a circular economy for packaging.

Following this Royal Decree, the Spanish Subdirectorate General for Circular Economy does not require the mandatory use of the Green Dot (el punto verde) symbol on packaging. However, extended producer responsibility (EPR) schemes may still request the use of markings on packaging to denote EPR membership.

The main purpose of this Royal Decree is to make all packaging on the market recyclable by 2030 and, where possible, reusable. Companies should design packaging and manage waste disposal in order to reduce its environmental impact.

Royal Decree 1055/2022 will apply as of January 1, 2025, and introduces several new requirements on packaging:

  • Packaging is considered to meet the basic requirements when it complies with the following standards:
    • UNE-EN 13427:2005 “Packaging – Requirements for the use of European standards in the field of packaging and packaging waste”;
    • UNE-EN 13428:2005 “Packaging – Requirements specific to manufacturing and composition – prevention by source reduction”;
    • UNE-EN 13429:2005 “Packaging – Reuse”;
    • UNE-EN 13430:2005 “Packaging – Requirements for packaging recoverable by material recycling”;
    • UNE-EN 13431:2005 “Packaging – Requirements for packaging recoverable in the form of energy recovery, including specification of minimum inferior calorific value” and
    • UNE-EN 13432:2001 “Packaging – Requirements for packaging recoverable through composting and biodegradation – Test scheme and evaluation criteria for the final acceptance of packaging”
    • Other existing harmonized EU and national standards or those that may be approved in the future.
  • Packaging shall indicate its reusable status and the symbol associated with the deposit, return and refund system.
  • Cosmetic packaging shall indicate the instructions for disposal.
  • Packaging cannot bear the claim to be “environmentally friendly” or any other equivalent.
  • Packaging that is compostable in home or industrial composting shall be marked with “do not leave in the environment”.
  • Manufacturers and/or importers shall have the documents supporting claims on packaging recyclability.

References:

Real Decreto 1055/2022, de 27 de diciembre, de envases y residuos de envases.

other REGULATORY UPDATES

Regulation (EU) 2022/692 – OMNIBUS ACT VI – New and Updated Classification of Cosmetic Ingredients

Ingredients: BENZOPHENONE, TEOPHYLLINE, MELAMINE, AZADIRACHTA EXTRACTS, TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE TRIACRYLATE, PENTETIC ACID, PENTASODIUM PENTETATE

Date of publication: 03/05/2022

Date of application: 01/12/2023

The Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 includes new or updated classification for 12 chemicals that may be used as cosmetic ingredients. Seven out of these 12 are now classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction (CMR) and are banned from cosmetic products marketed in the EU.

Read More »

SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan

Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »