SCCS Opinion on Biphenyl-2-ol and Sodium 2-biphenylolate as preservatives in cosmetics
Ingredients: BIPHENYL-2-OL; SODIUM 2-BIPHENYLOLATE

Date of publication: 25/10/2024

On October 25, 2024, the Scientific Commitee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published its opinion on the safety of Biphenyl-2-ol and Sodium 2-biphenylolate as preservatives in cosmetics.

What’s new?

On October 25, 2024, the SCCS published its opinion on the use of Biphenyl-2-ol (o-Phenylphenol) and Sodium 2-biphenylolate (Sodium o-Phenylphenate) as preservatives in cosmetic products. Biphenyl-2-ol is currently restricted in Annex V (entry nº7) of the Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009 with a maximum concentration of 0.2% (as phenol) in rinse-off products and 0.15% (as phenol) in leave-on products.

Based on the data provided, the SCCS considers o-Phenylphenol to be safe as a preservative at the current concentrations as described in the Cosmetics Regulation. The SCCS also considers Sodium o-Phenylphenate safe as a preservative ate the same concentrations. When used together, the maximum combined concentration should be:

  • 0.15% in leave-on products.
  • 0.2% in rinse-off products.

The assessment did not address the environmental safety of o-Phenylphenol and Sodium o-Phenylphenate and did not consider oral and inhalation routes.

References:

SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Opinion on the safety of ‘Biphenyl-2-ol’ and ‘Sodium 2-biphenylolate’ (CAS/EC No. 90-43-7/201-993-5 and 132-27-4/205-055-6) used in cosmetic products, preliminary version of 31 July 2024, final version of 25 October 2024, SCCS/1669/24

other REGULATORY UPDATES

Regulation (EU) 2022/1531 – OMNIBUS ACT V – applicable as of 17 December 2022

Ingredients: METHYL SALICYLATE, SODIUM HYDROXYMETHYLGLYCINATE, DBMC, MIBK

Date of publication: 15/09/2022

Date of application: 17/12/2022

The European Commission has published the Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1531, which amends the Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as regards the use in cosmetic products of certain substances classified as CMR, by adding new entries to Annex II and Annex III and revising an entry in Annex V.

Read More »

SCCS Preliminary Opinion on Sodium Bromothymol Blue (C186) as hair dyeing

Ingredients: SODIUM BROMOTHYMOL BLUE (C186)

Date of publication: 28/10/2022

Following the request from the EU Commission for a scientific opinion on the hair dye Sodium Bromothymol Blue (C186), on October 2022 the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) issued a preliminary opinion. In light of the data provided, when used in non-oxidative hair colouring products up to a maximum on-head concentration of 0.5%, the SCCS is of the opinion that the complete safety of Sodium Bromothymol Blue could not be assessed.

Read More »

SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan

Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?

Regulation (EU) 2022/1531 – OMNIBUS ACT V – applicable as of 17 December 2022

Ingredients: METHYL SALICYLATE, SODIUM HYDROXYMETHYLGLYCINATE, DBMC, MIBK

Date of publication: 15/09/2022

Date of application: 17/12/2022

The European Commission has published the Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/1531, which amends the Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as regards the use in cosmetic products of certain substances classified as CMR, by adding new entries to Annex II and Annex III and revising an entry in Annex V.

Read More »

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »