Children’s exposure to Methyl Salicylate: Preliminary SCCS Scientific Advice – Submission II
Ingredients: METHYL SALICYLATE

Date of publication: 16/05/2023

On May 16, 2023, the EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published a preliminary opinion on the use of Methyl Salicylate in cosmetics intended for children. The draft is open for comments until June 19, 2023.

On May 16, 2023, the EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published a draft opinion on the use of Methyl Salicylate (CAS No. 119-36-8) in cosmetics intended for children. The draft is open for comments until June 19, 2023.

Background

Methyl Salicylate (CAS number: 119-36-8) is the ester of methyl alcohol and salicylic acid and is used, in cosmetics and personal care products, as a denaturant, flavouring, oral care, perfuming and soothing agent. This substance was classified as toxic for reproduction (CMR substance, category 2) under the CLP Regulation, but it was not included in the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.

In October 2021, the SCCS issued its final opinion on Methyl Salicylate. The Committee concluded that Methyl Salicylate is considered safe when used in cosmetics up to the maximum concentration provided in the dossier submitted. Considering its classification as a CMR substance of category 2 and the SCCS opinion, the European Commission concluded that Methyl Salicylate should be added to the List of Substances Restricted in Cosmetic Products (Annex III to Regulation, entry 324), in accordance with the following table: 

What’s new?

In the SCCS/1633/21 Opinion, the SCCS concluded that Methyl Salicylate in toothpaste is safe for children under 6 years of age when used up to the maximum concentration of 2.52%.

In view of the conclusions of SCCS/1633/21 and the aggregate exposure, the SCCS considers the use of Methyl Salicylate as safe in cosmetic products intended for children of age 0.5-3 years when used up to a maximum concentration of 0.02% in shower gel, hand soap, shampoo, body lotion, face cream, hand cream, lip products. As no specific data were provided for children below 6 months, the SCCS has not considered this age category in this safety assessment.

The preliminary opinion is open for comments until June 19, 2023.

References:

SCCS Scientific Advice – Children exposure on Methyl salicylate (methyl 2-hydroxybenzoate)

other REGULATORY UPDATES

UK Responsible Person Labelling Deadline Extension

RESPONSIBLE PERSON

Date of application: 31/12/2025

The UK Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) have reviewed the requirement to label the product with the UK Responsible Person and have decided to extend this transitional provision for a total period of five years, until 31 December 2025.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?

French Anti-Waste Law – Impact in Cosmetics Packaging and Labelling

PACKAGING WASTE MANAGEMENT

Date of application: 01/01/2023, with a transition period until 09/03/2023 for packaging produced or imported before 09/09/2022.

The Loi relative à la lute contre le gaspillage et a l’économie circulaire (Anti-Waste for a circular economy) has come officially into force in France in 2020. From January 2023 the requirements of the law became mandatory, including specific symbols on the packaging or labelling of cosmetic products.

Read More »

SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan

Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Read More »

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »