New version of the French “Practical Guide to Environmental Claims” is published
New "Practical Guide to Environmental Claims" published in France

Date of publication: 25/05/2023

On 25 May 2023, the French Directorate General in charge of Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) and the French National Consumer Council (CNC) published the new version of the "Practical Guide to Environmental Claims", aimed at tackling greenwashing.

BACKGROUND

Consumers’ expectations regarding the impact of products and services on the environment have a growing influence on their purchasing behaviour. This leads more and more companies to communicate about the sustainability, responsibility and green credentials of their products and services. These environmental claims must comply with French legislation aimed at tackling greenwashing.

WHAT’S NEW?

On 25 May 2023, the French Directorate General in charge of Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) and the French National Consumer Council (CNC) published the new version of the “Practical Guide to Environmental Claims“. This version has been eagerly awaited for several years, as it provides guidelines on the new legislative framework applicable to greenwashing in France.

The updated guide incorporates recommendations regarding the voluntary use of environmental claims and outlines the conditions for using commonly used terms like “organic,” “sustainable,” “natural,” and “free from”.

“Free from”

The term “free from” is used to inform consumers about the absence of a substance that is identified as a health or environmental hazard. However, the claim “free from” cannot be used when referring to a substance that is no longer used, that is prohibited, or has never been used in the product.

“Organic”

For cosmetic products, if the finished product is certified organic, or 100% of ingredients are certified organic, the claim “organic” can apply to the entire product. On the other hand, if the overall level of organic ingredients is less than 100%, it must be indicated. Otherwise, the “organic” claim should only apply to the specific ingredient(s) to avoid misleading consumers.

“Natural”

If the product is described as “natural”, it must contain at least 95% of natural components.  If the finished product contains less than 95% natural ingredients, the percentage must be indicated. Failing this, the claim on naturalness must only appear next to the ingredient(s) concerned.

For cosmetic products, the use of the terms “natural”, “derived from natural” and “of natural origin” is based in particular on ISO 16128.

“Sustainable”

The term “sustainable” should be used to refer to the concept of sustainability, which encompasses the product’s durability over time and considers the challenges of sustainable development, including economic, social, and environmental impacts.

Any claim regarding sustainable development should be supported by measurable, relevant, significant, verifiable, and concrete evidence.

Reduced ecological footprint

Indicates a significant decrease in the environmental impact of the product throughout its entire life cycle compared to other products in the same category. Calculation of the ecological footprint should follow the guidelines outlined in (EU) Recommendation 2021/2279, with clear indication of whether the reduction pertains to packaging, the entire product, or a specific part of it as well as the nature and magnitude of the reductions in environmental impact achieved.

Compostable

Compostable products are those that can biodegrade under specific composting conditions, meeting requirements for disintegration, composition, and ecotoxicity of degradation products in natural environments. The term “compostable” depends on the medium and time scale.

The claim “compostable” is prohibited if the product is only compostable in an industrial unit.

Compostable plastic products and packaging in domestic or industrial composting must bear the words “Do not throw away in nature”.

WHAT NOW?

Environmental claims have become a growing priority for the French authorities surveillance. In 2021 and 2022, the DGCCRF conducted investigations into environmental claims used to promote non-food products and services. Of the 1,100 establishments inspected, one in four was found not to comply with French legislation, and the DGCCRF issued 141 warnings, 114 injunctions and initiated 18 criminal or administrative proceedings.

In order to protect themselves against greenwashing claims, cosmetic brands should ensure that, when using environmental claims, they comply with the most recent regulatory framework, as specified by the Guide and that they have reliable and verifiable evidence in support of those claims.

References:

Conseil National de la Consommation (CNC) – Guide pratique des allégations environnementales, 2023

other REGULATORY UPDATES

UK Responsible Person Labelling Deadline Extension

RESPONSIBLE PERSON

Date of application: 31/12/2025

The UK Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) have reviewed the requirement to label the product with the UK Responsible Person and have decided to extend this transitional provision for a total period of five years, until 31 December 2025.

Read More »

Regulation (EU) 2022/692 – OMNIBUS ACT VI – New and Updated Classification of Cosmetic Ingredients

Ingredients: BENZOPHENONE, TEOPHYLLINE, MELAMINE, AZADIRACHTA EXTRACTS, TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE TRIACRYLATE, PENTETIC ACID, PENTASODIUM PENTETATE

Date of publication: 03/05/2022

Date of application: 01/12/2023

The Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 includes new or updated classification for 12 chemicals that may be used as cosmetic ingredients. Seven out of these 12 are now classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction (CMR) and are banned from cosmetic products marketed in the EU.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?

SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan

Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Read More »

Regulation (EU) 2022/692 – OMNIBUS ACT VI – New and Updated Classification of Cosmetic Ingredients

Ingredients: BENZOPHENONE, TEOPHYLLINE, MELAMINE, AZADIRACHTA EXTRACTS, TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE TRIACRYLATE, PENTETIC ACID, PENTASODIUM PENTETATE

Date of publication: 03/05/2022

Date of application: 01/12/2023

The Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/692 includes new or updated classification for 12 chemicals that may be used as cosmetic ingredients. Seven out of these 12 are now classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction (CMR) and are banned from cosmetic products marketed in the EU.

Read More »

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »