DECO Alert: Hair Care Packaging Resembling Children’s Fruit Pouches
Topic: DECO ALERT: HAIR CARE PACKAGING RESEMBLING CHILDREN'S FRUIT POUCHES

Publication Date: 06/06/2024

On June 6, 2024, the association DECO PROteste reported that the packaging of the new Fructis hair care range could be mistaken for children's fruit pouches and reminded that the law prohibits "dangerous imitations."

The report was submitted to Infarmed, the Food and Economic Safety Authority (ASAE), and the Directorate-General for Consumer Affairs. According to this source, the law is not being followed due to the new packaging of the “Hair Booster” hair care line (Protein, Vitamin C, and Amino Acid) by Fructis, a brand of Garnier, marketed by L’Oréal.

The product line in question has a shape, color, and volume that, according to DECO, “can be easily mistaken for fruit pouches intended for children,” which they can open and ingest: “The amount of hair product in the packaging allows for multiple uses. Thus, after the first use, the spout of the package does not require much force to open, making it more accessible to children.”

According to national and European legislation, it is prohibited to manufacture, import, export, or market products known as ‘dangerous imitations,’ including cosmetics that can be mistaken for food. Therefore, non-food products that can mislead consumers by their appearance, packaging, labeling, or color are prohibited.

Although the warnings “Keep out of reach of young children without supervision” and “Do not ingest” were indicated, these alerts were considered “insufficient” due to the similarity of the packaging to a fruit pouch.

DECO stated that although it is increasingly common to find this type of packaging for refills, they usually have shapes and capacities different from food product packaging.

L’Oréal’s Position

In response to DECO, L’Oréal mentioned that flexible pouch packaging is becoming more common in the cosmetic industry due to environmental concerns, and it is highly likely that this format will expand to other product categories.

The company also argued that the packaging makes no reference to food and requires “a certain amount of force” to open, unlike food pouches.

References

DECO PROteste – New Fructis packaging can be mistaken for children’s food.

other REGULATORY UPDATES

SCCS Preliminary Opinion on Sodium Bromothymol Blue (C186) as hair dyeing

Ingredients: SODIUM BROMOTHYMOL BLUE (C186)

Date of publication: 28/10/2022

Following the request from the EU Commission for a scientific opinion on the hair dye Sodium Bromothymol Blue (C186), on October 2022 the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) issued a preliminary opinion. In light of the data provided, when used in non-oxidative hair colouring products up to a maximum on-head concentration of 0.5%, the SCCS is of the opinion that the complete safety of Sodium Bromothymol Blue could not be assessed.

Read More »

Italy and France – Environmental Labelling of Cosmetic Products

PACKAGING WASTE MANAGEMENT

Date of application:01/01/2023

Although the European Cosmetics Regulation is applicable to every cosmetic product made available in the European Union market, some national legislations may also apply. Environmental regulations in Italy and France specify mandatory labelling requirements applicable to packaged products marketed in these countries.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?

SCCS Final Opinion on the Safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan

Ingredients: TRICLOCARBAN and TRICLOSAN

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

During the plenary meeting on 24-25 October 2022, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) presented its final opinion on the safety of Triclocarban and Triclosan as substances with potential endocrine disrupting properties in cosmetic products.

Read More »

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »