Belgium Proposes Propylparaben to be classified as an Environmental Endocrine Disruptor Category 1 
Topic: BELGIUM PROPOSES PROPYLPARABEN TO BE CLASSIFIED AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR CATEGORY

Date of publication: 14/05/2024

On May 14, 2024, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) announced that Belgium plans to propose the harmonised classification and labelling of Propylparaben (Propyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, CAS no: 94-13-3, EC no:202-307-7) as an endocrine disruptor for the environment.

Background

Propylparaben (Propyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, CAS no: 94-13-3, EC no:202-307-7) is the ester of n-propyl alcohol and p-hydroxybenzoic acid. In cosmetics and personal care products, Propylparaben is used as a preservative and perfuming agent. This ingredient is currently regulated under entry 12 of Annex V of the European Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009 (List of preservatives allowed in cosmetics products). According to the Regulation, Propylparaben has concentration limits in finished products to 0.14% (for the sum of the individual concentrations) and 0.8% (for mixture of authorized parabens). It is also prohibited in leave-on products designed for application on the nappy area of children under 3 years old.

What’s new?

On May 14, 2024, ECHA announced that Belgium plans to propose the harmonised classification and labelling of Propylparaben as an Endocrine Disruptor Category 1 (ED ENV 1), EUH430 – May cause endocrine disruption in the environment. 

A substance is classified in Category 1 for endocrine disrupting properties for the environment if it is known or presumed to meet the following criteria: 

  • it shows an adverse effect in an intact organism or its progeny; 
  • it shows endocrine activity; 
  • the substance has an endocrine disrupting mode of action, i.e. there is a biologically plausible link between the endocrine activity and the adverse effect. 

The classification in Category 1 is based on evidence from human and/or on data from animal studies. Such data shall provide clear evidence of an adverse effect that is relevant for the (sub-) population level and which is a consequence of the endocrine activity. 

Despite Propylparaben’s proposed classification as ED ENV 1, it can still be used in cosmetic products as in accordance with Article 15 of Cosmetics Regulation 1223/2009, since this classification relates to the environment and not human health.

References

European Chemicals Agency – Registry of CLH intentions until outcome – Propyl 4-hydroxybenzoate. 14 May 2024 

other REGULATORY UPDATES

French Anti-Waste Law – Impact in Cosmetics Packaging and Labelling

PACKAGING WASTE MANAGEMENT

Date of application: 01/01/2023, with a transition period until 09/03/2023 for packaging produced or imported before 09/09/2022.

The Loi relative à la lute contre le gaspillage et a l’économie circulaire (Anti-Waste for a circular economy) has come officially into force in France in 2020. From January 2023 the requirements of the law became mandatory, including specific symbols on the packaging or labelling of cosmetic products.

Read More »

Italy and France – Environmental Labelling of Cosmetic Products

PACKAGING WASTE MANAGEMENT

Date of application:01/01/2023

Although the European Cosmetics Regulation is applicable to every cosmetic product made available in the European Union market, some national legislations may also apply. Environmental regulations in Italy and France specify mandatory labelling requirements applicable to packaged products marketed in these countries.

Read More »
Any REGULATORY QUESTION?

UK Responsible Person Labelling Deadline Extension

RESPONSIBLE PERSON

Date of application: 31/12/2025

The UK Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) have reviewed the requirement to label the product with the UK Responsible Person and have decided to extend this transitional provision for a total period of five years, until 31 December 2025.

Read More »

SCCS Revision of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A

Ingredients: RETINOL, RETINYL PALMITATE, RETINYL ACETATE, RETINYL LINOLEATE, RETINAL

Date of publication: 25/10/2022

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety has issued a final version of the Scientific Opinion on Vitamin A, concluding that exposure to Vitamin A derived from cosmetics can be a concern for higher exposure consumers, and since cosmetics alone do not exceed the upper limit the SCCS cannot suggest maximum concentration limits that take into account contributions from other sources.

Read More »