Monitoring report · published · reflects the rules at that date

SCCS publishes Scientific Opinion on Prostaglandin Analogues (SCCS/1680/25)

Our monitoring reports record the changes to cosmetics rules in a given period, and we publish one each month. Each one is a dated publication: it reflects the rules on the date it was published and is not updated afterwards. For what applies today, read the latest briefings or ask us.

See what happens after launch

What’s new?

On June 6 2025, the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) published a Scientific Opinion on prostaglandin analogues used in cosmetic products.

The current Opinion specifically addresses three prostaglandin analogues submitted by industry for safety evaluation: Methylamido-Dihydro-Noralfaprostal (MDN), Isopropyl Cloprostenate (IPCP), and Dechloro Dihydroxy Difluoro Ethylcloprostenolamide (DDDE). These substances are synthetic analogues designed to mimic natural prostaglandins and are primarily used in eyelash and eyebrow growth products.

This assessment was prompted by ongoing industry efforts to demonstrate the safety of prostaglandin analogues following the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) alert in 2018, which highlighted health risks associated with eyelash growth treatments containing these substances. This assessment represents a continuation of the Committee’s evaluation of these controversial ingredients following concerns raised in previous Opinion SCCS/1635/21 from February 2022.

Key Provisions

The SCCS evaluated industry-proposed concentration limits for three specific prostaglandin analogues when used in eyelash and eyebrow products:

  • Ethyl Tafluprostamide: 0.018%
  • Methylamido-Dihydro-Noralfaprostal: 0.03%
  • Isopropyl Cloprostenate: 0.005%

The SCCS concluded that none of the three prostaglandin analogues can be considered safe for use in cosmetic products intended for promoting eyelash and eyebrow growth, regardless of the proposed concentrations.

SCCS’s safety concerns included potent pharmacological activity at low concentrations, lack of acceptable reproductive/developmental toxicity data, primary users are likely to be young women and the application proximity to the eyes.

What now?

Deadline for submitting comments on the preliminary Opinion is 18 August 2025.

  • SCCS will review industry submissions and finalize the Opinion based on additional evidence
  • European Commission expected to initiate regulatory amendment process following final Opinion
  • Market surveillance authorities likely to increase enforcement of existing products

Regulatory Timeline: Following the final Opinion publication, the European Commission will likely prohibit these specific prostaglandin analogues through amendment to Annex II (Prohibited Substances) of the European Cosmetics Regulation, with implementation timelines typically providing 12-18 months for industry compliance.

References

SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Opinion on prostaglandin analogues used in cosmetic products, preliminary version of 28 May 2025, SCCS/1680/25

Need to know what this means for a product you have on the market now?

Ask the team for this area

One question works best. Leave out confidential product details; we can take those up by email.

Our team replies to every question. The reply goes to the email you gave.

We use your email to answer this question and for nothing else. Privacy and cookies

Follow an area

One email when an area publishes, in the language you choose. Nothing else.

Talk to us

Tell us the product, the market and the date you are working to. If the date is not realistic, we will say so.

Need a standing regulatory partner? See ongoing support →