Liliana Teles
CEO / Regulatory Affairs & Quality Assurance Director
Medical Devices
The intended purpose of your device determines its risk class, and the class sets the conformity route. We establish the class first, then consolidate the evidence, align your quality management system and prepare the submission with you. Where Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) or Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) requires a person responsible for regulatory compliance (PRRC), we can take on that role as an outsourced service.
We work under both regulations, on medical devices, in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs), software as a medical device and medical mobile apps. The route below is drawn for the EU and Portugal.
A first map, not a regulatory conclusion.
Is it a medical device or an IVD, and in which class? Qualification always comes first.
You get: a qualification and classification report.
The reasoning matters more than the answer. We take the intended purpose you define and analyse it against the classification rules and the guidance documents. If a conclusion depends on something we cannot confirm, the report says so.
Yes. Qualification comes before classification and before any conformity assessment route. It starts from a defined intended purpose.
The regulatory strategy and roadmap is one service, and it already contains the qualification and classification rationale. If you commission it, you do not need this report as well. If you only need the answer to "is it a device, and which class", the report stands on its own.
We give you a date once we have seen the demonstration. It depends on how well the intended purpose is defined and on the product's complexity. Software, for example, can have several modules, and some may qualify as a medical device while others do not.
Your regulatory strategy as a plan: the conformity route, how far a Notified Body is involved, and the milestones to market access.
You get: a roadmap, and a gap analysis against the general safety and performance requirements (GSPR).
The risk class is where the strategy starts. The strategy chooses the conformity route and sets the order of the work. The GSPR gap analysis shows where your device and your company stand today.
Time to market depends on the risk class of your device, on how far a Notified Body is involved, on the state of your technical documentation, clinical evidence above all, and on the maturity of your quality management system. The roadmap sets the milestones with you. If the date you are working to is not realistic, the roadmap says so.
Not as a written roadmap. For the US and other non-EU markets we map the route with you, market by market.
Technical documentation under Annexes II and III of the MDR or the IVDR, and the clinical evaluation with its literature search. Inside the CE-marking programme: risk management, usability, post-market surveillance (PMS) and, for an IVD, the IVD performance evaluation.
You get: the technical documentation a Notified Body assesses.
We have worked with a range of medical devices, IVDs and software as a medical device, across different risk classes.
No. We can review what you already have and advise on the gaps.
On request: a gap analysis of your procedures and study documentation, and support in contact with competent authorities where it applies.
Runs alongside the route
An ISO 13485 quality management system (QMS), built from scratch or adapted from your documents, and audited internally.
No. After a gap analysis, the system can be adapted from your existing documents. We can also complement an ISO 13485 system with other quality management standards, such as ISO 9001.
How long implementation takes depends on what already exists, on how many processes the system must cover, and on how quickly your team can review drafts and put the procedures into practice.
An outsourced QA Director can run the system for you, under an appointment agreement.
Yes. We provide training on the MDR, the IVDR and ISO 13485.
We prepare the submission and help you answer the Notified Body's questions through to CE marking. The Notified Body decides.
We cannot, and nobody should promise it. The decision belongs to the Notified Body. What we can promise is a file that answers the regulation clearly, and responses to findings that hold together.
Each Notified Body has its own timetable. In 2025, most Notified Bodies took 13 to 18 months from the signed written agreement to the certificate. What you and we control: how complete the documentation is when it is submitted, and how quickly and consistently questions are answered. The roadmap sets the milestones, and we tell you whether your date is realistic.
Not necessarily. The packages are modular, and what you need depends on the class and on what already exists. Whether a Notified Body is involved at all depends on the class, which is why qualification and classification come first.
All projects are different and we have no preferred Notified Body, but we can help you find the right fit.
For manufacturers: EUDAMED registration. For distributors and importers in Portugal: wholesale distribution under Portaria n.º 256/2016.
It depends on your activity in Portugal. We look at your activities and advise you.
No. In Portuguese both are called Responsável Técnico, but they are two legal roles under two laws: Decreto-Lei n.º 29/2024, Article 27, for medical device distribution, and Decreto-Lei n.º 189/2008 for cosmetic products.
The date depends on how many devices you register, whether you already have an SRN, and what information is available for each device. We give you dates once we know the list.
Yes. We provide remote GDP training for medical device distribution teams.
Post-market surveillance, vigilance, and the person responsible for regulatory compliance.
Roles we can take on:
We offer the PRRC as an outsourced service. Whether your company may appoint one from outside its own organisation is something we verify first.
No. Appointing a PRRC does not remove your company's legal liability. The PRRC's responsibilities under the Regulation do not change your own obligations, so you remain liable for any damage caused by defective devices.
CEO / Regulatory Affairs & Quality Assurance Director
Leads regulatory affairs and quality assurance for medical devices and cosmetics: ISO 13485 quality systems, CE-marking roadmaps, EN ISO 14971 risk management, cosmetic product safety reports and claims.
Medical Devices Regulatory Affairs Consultant
Works on qualification and classification under the Medical Devices Regulation, clinical evaluation literature research, risk management and technical documentation.
Medical Devices Regulatory Affairs Consultant
Works on quality systems to ISO 13485, with more than 15 years in quality assurance and regulatory affairs at a manufacturer of non-active medical devices.
Software as a medical device, medical mobile apps and IVDs are part of our scope, not an add-on. For software we work with MDCG 2019-11 on qualification, IEC 62304 on the lifecycle and EN IEC 62366-1 on usability.
That depends on the class and on what you already have. The regulatory strategy tells you which steps apply, in what order, and where a Notified Body comes in. If you only need to know whether the product is a device, start with qualification and classification.
The route we draw is for the EU and Portugal. For the UK and the US, we map the route with you, product by product, before anything is agreed.
The class, how far a Notified Body is involved, and the state of your documentation and quality system set the timeline. The regulatory strategy turns them into milestones.
Four EUDAMED modules have been mandatory since 28 May 2026. Devices already on the market have until 27 November 2026. Who registers what, and what changed in Portugal.
From 25 February 2027, notified bodies under the MDR and IVDR must quote on defined information, keep to maximum timelines and publish their performance. What it changes for manufacturers.
Whether software is a medical device depends on what you say it is for, not on the code. The qualification test under the MDR and IVDR, updated for 2025 guidance.
Clinical data from an equivalent device can support your clinical evaluation, but the MDR sets a higher bar than the Directives did. The three characteristics, data access, and documentation.
Tell us what the device is, where you want to sell it, and the date you are working to. Our team replies to every enquiry. If the date is not realistic, we say so.